Not surprisingly, in the final countdown to the five special municipality elections on Nov. 27, the Taiwanese political scene has been full of negative campaigns, smear attacks, tears, partisan talk show finger-pointing and last-minute dirty tricks.
There is no doubt that the results of the elections will have implications for Taiwan’s political landscape. Nevertheless, what matters most is the extent to which party politics will evolve in the post-municipality-election era and what aspects of policy debate the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) decide to carry over to future legislative and presidential elections.
The number of seats and total votes that each party can garner will determine the winner and the loser. The ruling KMT and President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration need not only ensure the continuation of its governance of Taipei, the soon-to-be formed Sinbei City (the upgraded Taipei County) and Taichung, but also to avoid a further decline in votes on the heels of the three-in-one local elections in December last year and a series of legislative by-elections. The DPP hopes to win more seats in addition to the cities of Kaohsiung and Tainan, and outnumber the KMT in voter turnout.
Despite old campaign practices, the voters are witnessing the emergence of a new electoral culture and campaign style, which constitute a driving force for the maturation of Taiwan’s political culture. For example, DPP Taipei mayoral candidate Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) and Sinbei City mayoral candidate DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) have both introduced a non-traditional campaign style.
Faced with the reality that the KMT enjoys more vote leverage in both cities, Su and Tsai are downplaying partisan disputes and portraying their campaigns as a debate on governing capability.
If Su and Tsai are to win, it will signify a transformation in Taiwan’s political culture to an institutionalized party competition that centers more on rationality, moderation and bipartisanship. If Su or Tsai represent the DPP for the presidential election in 2012 or 2016, they will both have the legitimacy and the popularity to help shift the DPP’s image of a conventionally pro-independence force to that of a responsible and responsive political party that transcends the blue-green dichotomy in Taiwanese society. The debate over the party’s future cross-strait policy will also be based largely on pragmatism and take international expectations more into account.
If Su and Tsai stick to what they have advocated in the campaign and successfully convince the middle-of-the-road voters to endorse them, Taiwanese politics and the DPP will enter into a new phase of democratic transformation where the voters’ decision will be based more on leadership, governing capability and government efficiency than the issue of unification or independence.
As the ruling power, Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) has faced tremendous pressures from Su’s moderate and non-partisan campaign strategy. The KMT also faced a similar crisis in Sinbei City when Taipei County Commissioner Chou Hsi-wei (周錫瑋) was ranked as the worst governor in Taiwan. To secure a win, the KMT replaced Chou with former vice premier Eric Chu (朱立倫).
Even though the special municipality elections are local by nature, they have been portrayed as a midterm election for Ma. He and the KMT can not afford to lose either Taipei or Sinbei City because it will signify a vote of no confidence in Ma’s governance.
That’s the main strategic calculation behind the KMT’s planned parade tomorrow to rally hard-core KMT supporters. Given that most KMT supporters were reluctant to go out and vote for the party in the previous elections, Ma and the party’s leadership believe that the only effective way to beat Su is to utilize the KMT’s electoral -advantage in Taipei to increase the blue camp’s voter mobilization.
From a campaign perspective, is natural for the KMT to highlight the blue-green division in Taipei and Sinbei cities to prevent light-blue voters from supporting DPP candidates. Nevertheless, this serves to accelerate the deterioration of Taiwan’s political culture along partisan lines and ethnic divisions.
Since the KMT has controlled both the executive and legislative branches of government since Ma took office, the KMT should take full responsibility for the broadening of the partisan divide within Taiwanese society. Absolute governance means absolute responsibility. It is irresponsible to blame all the faults on the opposition DPP for what is in fact the KMT’s own poor governance.
After a decade of blue-green political wrestling, Taiwanese voters are craving new leaders with bold and realistic agendas, coupled with the skill to communicate and persuade. Most importantly, most voters expect a new mayor who can deliver on his or her campaign promises and refrain from using partisan divisions to distract from poor governance.
This is the true meaning of the special municipality elections.
Liu Shih-chung is a senior research fellow at the Taipei-based Taiwan Brain Trust.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.