I have been thinking about the future of Taiwan.
First, let me take the story of a house as an example — the ancestral home of the current owner. The story begins not long after the end of World War II when waves of Chinese took refuge in Taiwan. The homeowner, taking pity on a refugee family that couldn’t find shelter, allowed them to stay in the house. Little did he know then that the refugees would live there for more than 60 years. During this period, the guest family, behaving as if they were the new masters, did whatever they pleased in the house. They helped themselves to food, used whatever household items they liked and even slept in the owner’s bed, forcing him to sleep on the floor.
The relationship between the two families was basically confrontational in nature. There were times, of course, when the tension eased. The guests, for instance, occasionally took the owner’s children out for a treat or to play, for which the children were always very grateful. Similarly, the owner himself was always happy when he thought he had won an argument. Essentially, however, the two families under the same roof fought and quarreled incessantly.
Please think about this carefully: Isn’t the only way to solve this problem — and for the owner to regain control of his house — is to remove the refugee family?
The thought of my next true story always makes me terribly sad. It happened in 1968 when my late husband accepted an invitation to work for the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), which was to dispatch him to Malaysia. He was all ready to go with his passport and letter of appointment in hand, waiting for an airline ticket and a UN-issued transportation expense voucher. After two weeks of waiting, he was surprised to receive a letter from the FAO reassigning him from Malaysia to another country.
The FAO apologized, but I was deeply saddened to learn that the reason behind the reassignment was that Taiwan was not an internationally recognized country — and that is the root cause of the tragedy of the Taiwanese.
I think about the 1994 Qiandao Lake Incident in China, in which 24 Taiwanese were murdered. At that time, the Chinese government dealt with the incident indifferently, and the government in Taiwan did not lift a finger to protect its people, forcing the victims’ families to seek justice themselves.
In 1990, a Japanese student, Iguchi Mariko, went missing in Taiwan. Her countrymen and government demonstrated the utmost concern and provided every possible assistance in helping to search for her. The Japanese girl and the Taiwanese victims were treated very differently by their respective governments. The contrast couldn’t have been more stark.
The status of Taiwan as a nation-state remains undetermined, which is the main reason the international community holds it in disregard. That is a tragedy for Taiwanese. It is imperative that we have a country of our own that is properly recognized by the world. However, is the Republic of China a country? If so, why is it that the international community denies us the right to participate in its activities? Privately, yes, we are allowed space to deal with international friends, but when it comes to official businesses, we are either pushed to one side or excluded altogether.
I’m hopeful that my compatriots will sit down, calmly ponder the future of our beloved land and work together to establish our own country, so that we may have happy days ahead. My concluding thought is this: We urgently need a country to rely on and protect us. This is the voice of the Taiwanese people!
Yang-Liu Hsiu-Hwa is a Taiwan-based writer.
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
Chung Yuan ChristiaN University is clearly in bed with the People’s Republic of China. This can be the only explanation why the school’s authorities have done their utmost to shield a student, who lodged a complaint against an associate professor, and then used thuggish tactics to compel the teacher to issue two separate apologies to China. The original complaint, filed by an unnamed Chinese student, was for remarks by associate professor Chao Ming-wei (招名威) during a class on the origin of COVID-19. A second complaint was filed by the same student after Chao, during an apology, stated that he was a
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in her inaugural address on May 20 firmly said: “We will not accept the Beijing authorities’ use of ‘one country, two systems’ to downgrade Taiwan and undermine the cross-strait status quo.” The Chinese government was not too happy, and later that day, an opinion piece on the Web site of China’s state broadcaster China Central Television said: “While Tsai’s first inaugural address four years ago was read by Beijing as an ‘unfinished answer sheet,’ the one she presented this time was even more below-par.” Speaking to the China Review News Agency, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies vice president
During my twenty-two years in the US Senate, I became a student of Taiwan and its history. I was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific and International Cybersecurity Policy, and have made at least 25 trips to Taiwan and have been invited as an observer to two of the nation’s presidential elections. Taiwan’s continuous economic miracle has seen the nation transition from a mixed agricultural-industrial society at the end of Japan’s 50 years of jurisdiction to today’s economic powerhouse, unmatched by most nations of the world. Just as outstanding has been Taiwan’s decades of resistance and