It would have been a lot easier to believe President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) impassioned pledge on Tuesday to push through judicial reform if it hadn’t come after his predecessor was found not guilty of a major corruption charge.
It’s not as if former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) will be able to avoid being behind bars for the foreseeable future — even if he was released from “pre-trial detention” — anytime soon. After all, the Taipei District Court verdict on Friday last week finding Chen, Wu Shu-jen (吳淑珍) and 19 codefendants not guilty of money laundering and graft (in the case of the former first couple) and breach of trust and insider trading (for the others) was followed on Thursday by the Supreme Court upholding a bribery conviction against the couple in a land purchase scandal that will see them serving 11 years.
While the Taipei District Court ruling can be appealed — and the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office Special Investigation Panel is doing just that — the Supreme Court ruling was the final one for that particular case.
One might even say there was a yin-yang kind of balance to these verdicts, except that comments made by the president, the Presidential Office, senior government officials and lawmakers have been anything but balanced.
There is definitely a kind of black humor to the fact that Ma and his minions keep saying that it would be “inconvenient” or “inappropriate” for him to comment on Chen’s legal battles, and then turn right around and condemn the judicial system and the judge who dared to say there was not enough evidence to convict Chen.
Of course the Presidential Office and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus were equally quick to say on Thursday that they respected the Supreme Court’s decision.
Ma thinks it would be “inconvenient” for him to comment on Chen? What is truly inconvenient for the country is to have a president who claims to want judicial reform, but then says the judiciary must not isolate itself from the outside world or deviate from public expectations. It is inappropriate for Presidential Office Spokesman Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) to say that Ma must heed the public’s feelings about judicial reform and yet go on to say with a straight face that Ma would strictly adhere to his constitutional duty and not interfere in any ongoing legal cases regardless of strong public opinion that he should do so.
Ma and the KMT were basically dragged kicking and screaming into supporting legislation to overhaul the way the nation’s judges are selected, trained and retained by a series of corruption scandals this summer implicating several Taiwan High Court judges and a Supreme Court judge that were just too big to be ignored. Now however, the KMT-dominated legislature is suddenly set to embrace the proposal in the wake of the Chen verdicts.
In addition, Ma and the KMT are trying to tar the judge who ruled in Chen’s favor with the same brush they used for those detained this summer — as an example of the kind of judge that needs to be weeded out — while they whip up an almost lynch-mob mentality among their supporters with comments about “ignoring evidence” and “public expectations.” It sounds like they think the qualifications for a judge should be determined by political correctness, not legal ability and the willingness to render verdicts based on evidence and the law alone.
The rule of law is about respecting and obeying the law — regardless of whether you agree with it, not cherry-picking the rules and verdicts you like. For judges, it is about handing down rulings based on the evidence, not about what the public wants.
That might be inconvenient, but it is the truth.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS