In recent weeks, on anniversaries marking the war of resistance against Japan and the Japanese defeat of Aboriginal fighters in the Wushe Incident, as well as in his Double Ten National Day address, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has not missed the opportunity to rub a little dirt in the wounds left by World War II. From the horse’s mouth, we heard how Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) troops defeated the Japanese. Ma touts the KMT “victory” over the Japanese as a turning point in history.
In what history book did the president read that the KMT defeated the Japanese? Yes, the Japanese lost World War II, but their defeat was brought about by the Allied Powers, and mainly the US. Chinese troops played a role against the Japanese, but as the KMT had retreated as far inland as they could go, there wasn’t much they could do to stop the bulk of the Japanese imperial army. Some academics even say the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), in between skirmishes with the KMT, did more to resist the Japanese than the KMT, thus winning the hearts and minds of the Chinese populace.
So, why is Ma rewriting history?
Could it be because the enemy of your enemy is your friend? Many Chinese, and especially the CCP, have never forgiven the Japanese, in some cases rightfully, for the atrocities the imperial army brought down upon their country. The Rape of Nanking is just one horrible instance in which even Nazi officials stationed in the city were flabbergasted by the bloodshed.
It’s not uncommon in China to hear or see open hostility toward Japan. Many popular movies portray the Japanese as dogs. Just take a look at the Bruce Lee (李小龍) movie Fist of Fury for an example. However, in this type of popular portrayal, even worse than the Japanese themselves are the Chinese who work for them. They are considered traitors to their motherland, worse than worms and worthy of complete destruction.
That sentiment is alive and thriving in China.
In Taiwan, however, there is a much different view of the Japanese. Despite taking Taiwan as the spoils of war in 1895, Japan quickly worked to build the island’s infrastructure, seeking to turn it into an integral part of the Japanese empire. Even though Ma dismissed the Japanese building efforts in a speech at Taipei Zhongshan Hall on Monday to mark Retrocession Day — a day marking the end of Japanese rule in Taiwan — the rest of Taiwan remembers it differently.
The Japanese built roads, railroads, schools, hospitals, ports and government buildings. In fact, many of the KMT’s early development projects were simply continuations of work begun by the Japanese, such as the Central Cross-Island Highway. The Japanese unified the island, which had been divided by simmering conflict between Hoklo-speaking Taiwanese and Aborigines, established industries and educated the populace. This is something that the Chinese had never done for Taiwan. The Japanese brought modernity, even if it was at the point of a gun.
Ma wants to forget all this in the rush to cozy up with his anti-Japanese bedfellows, the CCP. But Taiwanese are smarter, and their memories go deeper than that. Some people here, especially the ones who identify themselves fully as Chinese, will jump onto that bandwagon and trumpet the Chinese “victory” over the Japanese. However, most will remember their grandparents singing Japanese songs, take their shoes off at the doors to their house and appreciate their Japanese connections.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS