Suggestion for Ma
The international community and most people in Taiwan have concluded that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) cares more for China than he does for Taiwan, as former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) has alleged.
If Ma and his administration want to prove this wrong and dispute a recent Associated Press report, they should write an open letter to Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) to be published in the New York Times or the Washington Post which might read something like this:
Dear President Hu:
I believe that the majority of the people of Taiwan will agree to political dialogue between China and Taiwan under the following conditions:
1. China must release all political prisoners, including Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) and his fellow dissidents;
2. China must carry out political reform and adopt a multiparty system;
3. China must draft a new constitution that should incorporate the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;
4. China must strive to -preserve the languages and cultures of minority groups and grant them full autonomy on education and local affairs;
5. China must accept the historical facts about Taiwan and respect the right of its people to determine their own future by way of referendum.
JIM CHUNG
Southfield, Michigan
Open question to Washington
Dear Honorable AIT Director William Stanton:
I am a 90-year-old Taiwanese housewife. I received a Japanese education from elementary-school through college. I was treated very unfairly and discriminated against by the Japanese authorities because I did not have my own country. Ever since, I have yearned for a country to call my own and that will look after me.
Alas, my dream has yet to become a reality. I often see in the media that your great country, the US, refers to our government officials as “Taiwan authorities” and states openly that, “We do not support Taiwan independence.”
I wonder how you would feel if you were me?
In the international community, the country that has bullied Taiwan the most has been the People’s Republic of China. That said, only a minority of the populace in such nations as the US, Japan, Germany, the UK and the Netherlands could claim to understand and sympathize with Taiwan, while the majority remain indifferent to its fate.
At the end of World War II, when Japan was defeated, I was at a loss as to why your great nation would provide assistance to the “Republic of China” to gain control of Taiwan — without the consent of the Taiwanese people. That fateful move allowed Taiwanese to suffer through the 228 Massacre, White Terror and the longest period of martial law in human history. It has also made Taiwanese fearful and easily intimidated. To this day, Taiwanese are so politically numb that they live in a contradiction, fruitlessly begging the Ma administration to do this or that.
I am a Christian. Your great nation is also founded on Christian principles. During the presidential inauguration, your president put his hand on the Bible to show his respect for God. Is this tradition just a meaningless formality? Our Lord Jesus Christ is a loving God. I sometimes question where that love is to be found in your great country. I am aware that politics is often heartless, cruel, pragmatic and self-interested. I am begging you, however, to kneel before the Lord and answer my question: Does your great country have a loving heart? I earnestly hope to receive a positive answer, so that this old lady may feel comforted and reassured.
The US federal court has rendered a judgment that Taiwanese are stateless — people without nationality. For over 60 years, Taiwanese have been living in a kind of political prison. While Taiwanese cannot liberate themselves, I — with the few remaining years I have — would love to be the Esther of the Bible and help save them. I hope you will relay my letter to the president of your great nation, Mr Barack Obama. I am hopeful that he will provide assistance to my cause in finding a better future for Taiwan.
YANG LIU HSIU-HWA
Taipei
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Former Fijian prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry spoke at the Yushan Forum in Taipei on Monday, saying that while global conflicts were causing economic strife in the world, Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy (NSP) serves as a stabilizing force in the Indo-Pacific region and offers strategic opportunities for small island nations such as Fiji, as well as support in the fields of public health, education, renewable energy and agricultural technology. Taiwan does not have official diplomatic relations with Fiji, but it is one of the small island nations covered by the NSP. Chaudhry said that Fiji, as a sovereign nation, should support
RSS