Suggestion for Ma
The international community and most people in Taiwan have concluded that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) cares more for China than he does for Taiwan, as former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) has alleged.
If Ma and his administration want to prove this wrong and dispute a recent Associated Press report, they should write an open letter to Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) to be published in the New York Times or the Washington Post which might read something like this:
Dear President Hu:
I believe that the majority of the people of Taiwan will agree to political dialogue between China and Taiwan under the following conditions:
1. China must release all political prisoners, including Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) and his fellow dissidents;
2. China must carry out political reform and adopt a multiparty system;
3. China must draft a new constitution that should incorporate the Universal Declaration of Human Rights;
4. China must strive to -preserve the languages and cultures of minority groups and grant them full autonomy on education and local affairs;
5. China must accept the historical facts about Taiwan and respect the right of its people to determine their own future by way of referendum.
JIM CHUNG
Southfield, Michigan
Open question to Washington
Dear Honorable AIT Director William Stanton:
I am a 90-year-old Taiwanese housewife. I received a Japanese education from elementary-school through college. I was treated very unfairly and discriminated against by the Japanese authorities because I did not have my own country. Ever since, I have yearned for a country to call my own and that will look after me.
Alas, my dream has yet to become a reality. I often see in the media that your great country, the US, refers to our government officials as “Taiwan authorities” and states openly that, “We do not support Taiwan independence.”
I wonder how you would feel if you were me?
In the international community, the country that has bullied Taiwan the most has been the People’s Republic of China. That said, only a minority of the populace in such nations as the US, Japan, Germany, the UK and the Netherlands could claim to understand and sympathize with Taiwan, while the majority remain indifferent to its fate.
At the end of World War II, when Japan was defeated, I was at a loss as to why your great nation would provide assistance to the “Republic of China” to gain control of Taiwan — without the consent of the Taiwanese people. That fateful move allowed Taiwanese to suffer through the 228 Massacre, White Terror and the longest period of martial law in human history. It has also made Taiwanese fearful and easily intimidated. To this day, Taiwanese are so politically numb that they live in a contradiction, fruitlessly begging the Ma administration to do this or that.
I am a Christian. Your great nation is also founded on Christian principles. During the presidential inauguration, your president put his hand on the Bible to show his respect for God. Is this tradition just a meaningless formality? Our Lord Jesus Christ is a loving God. I sometimes question where that love is to be found in your great country. I am aware that politics is often heartless, cruel, pragmatic and self-interested. I am begging you, however, to kneel before the Lord and answer my question: Does your great country have a loving heart? I earnestly hope to receive a positive answer, so that this old lady may feel comforted and reassured.
The US federal court has rendered a judgment that Taiwanese are stateless — people without nationality. For over 60 years, Taiwanese have been living in a kind of political prison. While Taiwanese cannot liberate themselves, I — with the few remaining years I have — would love to be the Esther of the Bible and help save them. I hope you will relay my letter to the president of your great nation, Mr Barack Obama. I am hopeful that he will provide assistance to my cause in finding a better future for Taiwan.
YANG LIU HSIU-HWA
Taipei
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
RSS