Sometimes one can’t help but wonder whether President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), in the dead of night, ever finds his conscience stirring as he reflects on words he used during the day.
In a speech titled “Reform, Innovation and Pursuit of Justice,” Ma, in his Double Ten National Day address, pledged to set up a human rights consultative committee under the Presidential Office in a bid to improve human rights in Taiwan.
“I promise that with regard to any issue pertaining to social justice, environmental justice or judicial integrity, we will take active steps to meet the expectations of our people,” Ma said. He also vowed that the government would work “to further promote the development and protection of human rights and basic freedoms.”
The words may look pretty in print and sound impressive, but who was Ma trying to fool? In case he hasn’t realized, it was under his presidency these past two years that Taiwanese suffered the most severe infringements of their individual human rights in the past decade.
The public wasn’t blind, and it wasn’t an illusion when they witnessed police using excessive force to stop people expressing themselves with Republic of China (ROC) national flags during Chinese envoy Chen Yunlin’s (陳雲林) visit in November 2008.
Nor were Taiwanese having delusions when they saw people dragged from their afternoon tea simply because they were at the same hotel where Chen was staying or people questioned by police on the streets for wearing T-shirts bearing the words “Taiwan is my country” and pulled over for riding scooters decorated with Tibetan flags.
The public wasn’t deaf, either — it wasn’t make--believe when young girls screamed after their fingers were injured by police officers who forcibly wrested ROC flags out of their hands; nor was it untrue that a music store was forced by police to stop playing the Song of Taiwan.
More instances of human rights under Ma: The Wild Strawberry Student Movement was formed after the Ma government used excessive force against the public; increasing allegations surfaced of government meddling in the Public Television Service; and the government demonstrated dubious intentions during the controversial name-change of the Taiwan Human Rights Memorial to Jingmei Cultural Park.
In view of all these disturbing reports of how public rights, freedom of speech and freedom of the press have been eroded by government action, Ma has only himself to blame when Taiwanese take his pledges with a grain of salt.
Ma trumpets the fact that his administration in May last year ratified two UN human rights covenants — the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. However, China also signed those covenants, yet it continues to brutalize its people, so Ma should stop patting himself on the back and take concrete actions to win people’s respect.
As Ma so well put it in his National Day speech: “Democracy and freedom have come to define the spirit of Taiwan.”
The public is waiting to see what Ma has to offer as he revamps his human rights protection pledges. Otherwise, it will only be a matter of time before the public looks back on Ma’s establishment of the so-called human rights consultative committee as one of the biggest ironies of his administration.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS