Ever since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was elected, demands that China remove the missiles it has aimed at Taiwan have been a hot topic. Most people know that in a military sense, removing the missiles is meaningless, but far fewer people have considered the real implication of this question: Would it hurt Taiwan’s security?
On July 9, Xiamen University’s Center for Taiwan Studies held a symposium on new breakthroughs in Taiwan studies giving special attention to mutual military trust. This was also the first time Chinese scholars proposed concrete ideas and conditions for an agreement on military safety and mutual trust between China and Taiwan, issuing eight articles and 43 clauses.
On July 30, Chinese Ministry of National Defense spokesman Geng Yansheng (耿雁生) said China might consider removing the missiles along the Fujian Province coast to spur the peaceful development of cross-strait relations. However, the basic premise of Geng’s comments was that Taiwan must first agree to the “one China” principle.
At that time, I looked into the situation in more detail and found that things are not as black and white as they may first appear.
Given that China could go even further in its soft approach of engaging in strategic talks while also intensifying its military approach, there are at least three possibilities in regards to removing the missiles.
The best approach would be for China to agree to remove the missiles and openly announce to the international community that it would not resort to military force to solve the Taiwan issue as long as Taiwan does not pursue independence. The second-best approach would involve removing the missiles and negotiating a mechanism for building mutual military trust based on the so-called “1992 consensus,” while the worst approach would be to remove the missiles and end cross-strait hostilities on the condition that Taiwan recognizes the “one China” principle.
Less than three months later, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) said in New York on Sept. 22 that now that the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement has been signed and that cross-strait relations are increasingly close, the two sides can take steps in promoting mutual political and military trust. In his responses to questions from reporters, Wen said the missiles eventually would be removed. Noticeably, Wen did not insist on the “one China” principle.
Now, the non-issue of removing the missiles has become a real bargaining chip for China as it gives senior Chinese officials a lot of wiggle room when making political strategy.
At the same time, Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense (MND) has become weak and marginalized in the process. Because Taiwan’s military strategy traditionally follows the government’s political strategy, even when senior members of the MND have different opinions or are unwilling to do something, it seems they have little choice but to passively follow along.
Recently, Mei Fu-hsing (梅復興), director of the US-based Taiwan Strait Security Research and Analysis Center, revealed that the US originally wanted to invite Taiwanese Minister of National Defense Kao Hua-chu (高華柱) to the US to take part in a US-Taiwan Defense Industry Conference and hold talks with senior US officials. This never happened because it was not supported by Taiwan’s US-based diplomats. The MND thus had to forgo the opportunity.
While officials deny this, it is clearly not just a rumor and offers proof of the extent to which the MND has been weakened and marginalized. In the future, I am afraid our last line of defense will be the will of Taiwan’s citizens.
Wang Jyh-perng is an associate research fellow at the Association for Managing Defense and Strategies.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused