Recent weeks have seen numerous allegations of financial mismanagement, pork barrel politics and outright corruption involving the Taipei International Flora Expo. Approved by the International Association of Horticulture Producers in 2006 when President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was Taipei mayor, the expo, due to open in November, was to be the keystone in Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin’s (郝龍斌) re-election bid. Once a near-lock, Hau’s return to office is now seriously threatened by the expo controversy, which only promises to get worse now that the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office has taken over the investigation.
The value of the flora expo is not in doubt. Barring a major reversal, money invested in the project is likely to turn a profit, while Taipei may gain international recognition as its host. And both the media and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) city councilors have performed brilliantly in exposing the irregularities even as Hau’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) administration did everything possible to hide them.
Yet hanging over the flora expo controversy is a larger question that all sides need to address, including the media, which is the emphasis on projects that promise short-term political and financial gain, while others get short shrift because they are not as flashy or require long-term commitments that will eventually benefit someone else.
This imbalance between short and long-term political will is especially apparent in the attention given the flora expo, a project that is more show than substance, as the government continues to issue policy statements in response to the nation’s population crisis. Faced with a further decline in a birthrate already too low to sustain the population, the Ministry of the Interior last week announced a new program that will give families NT$3,000 a month for childcare services.
With daycare costs in the range of NT$25,000 per month, it is hard to imagine that such a subsidy would encourage working couples to have children, especially since they must have at least three to be eligible for the subsidy — and it will last only until the qualifying child reaches the age of two.
Even less impressive was another initiative by the ministry, namely a contest to come up with a slogan to promote childbirth. The winning submission: “Children are our most precious treasures.”
Pressed on the subject of the declining birthrate, Deputy Minister of the Interior Chien Tai-lang (簡太郎) in March declared that Taiwanese should begin to look more favorably on children born out of wedlock.
More than a lack of political will, the sheer absurdity of such responses reflects the importance of the issue. Whatever malfeasance was committed in the run-up to the flora expo, and whatever good it will bring, pales in comparison to the effect of continued population decline. Indeed, one would be hard-pressed to think of another issue as important, including the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) and Chinese missiles across the Taiwan Strait.
The declining birthrate increases the problem of an aging population. It threatens labor shortages, falling domestic consumption, declining tax revenues and increased dependence on foreign workers — and students. The education system is already feeling the pinch as enrollment figures fall, forcing hundreds of schools to close and teachers to be laid off. Whatever the dangers of admitting Chinese students to Taiwanese universities, who will fill the seats without them?
Flower shows are fine, but governments must offer leadership on the messier problems facing the nation. Other developed countries are successfully dealing with their population issues. Taiwan’s declining birthrate should be declared a threat to national security and the Ministry of the Interior told to raise its game. In Taipei, perhaps the next mayor can depend less on bling and more on babies.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS