It’s no wonder it has been so tough to establish and enforce intellectual copyright protection in this country when the leadership continually claims credit for others’ ideas and work. Of course, this isn’t really anything new. Back in the 1970s and 1980s, the government was claiming full credit for the expansion or renewal of projects that were planned under the Japanese colonial administration.
Vice President Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) proudly told a Rotary Club function on Thursday that most of the events to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the Republic of China (ROC) next year have been finalized. He’s in a good position to know, since he is chairman of the Centenary Celebration Preparation Committee.
However, his list should have raised some eyebrows. Siew said the anniversary program would include 15 theme events and seven international functions.
Among those seven international events are the International Design Alliance Congress in Taipei, the World Association for Symphonic Bands and Ensembles (WASBE) Conference in Chiayi City, the International Flora Expo in Taipei and a Ladies Professional Golf Association (LPGA) tournament. The first three were well in hand long before the centenary committee was established and their organizers should feel miffed, at the very least, that some of their glory is being expropriated by the committee — which for all intents and purposes means the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
The Taiwan Floriculture Development Association, with the backing of the Taipei City Government, won the bid to host the 2010 flora exposition back in April 2006. The Chiayi International Wind Music Festival is almost two decades old, which was probably a contributing factor back in July 2007 to Chiayi City winning the right to host the 2011 World Wind Music Conference, which includes the 15th WASBE conference and the 2011 International Band Festival. As for the design congress, the announcement that Taipei was awarded the event was made on Oct. 9, 2007.
Claiming credit for others’ ideas just isn’t sporting. Taiwanese golfer Yani Tseng’s (曾雅妮) father, Tseng Mao-hsin (曾茂炘), asked the government last year to fund a tournament, but President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the Sports Council dismissed the idea at the time on the grounds that it would be too expensive.
Eily Ho (何麗純), manager of the Peitou Kuohua Golf County Club in Taipei, has said she discussed the idea of an LPGA event in Taiwan in October next year with LPGA officials in Florida in February and said they had responded positively.
Lo and behold, last month the Golf Association of Taiwan announced that Taiwan would be hosting an LPGA event for three years, starting next year, and that a key factor for starting next year was to celebrate the centennial.
Siew isn’t the only government official seeking to link already planned events to the centennial.
In May, Minister of Economic Affairs Shih Yen-shiang (施顏祥) was quoted as saying: “Next year’s ROC centennial celebrations will be the perfect platform for showcasing the innovative values of Taiwan’s design industries.”
It is terrific that Taiwan will be playing host to so many international events next year because that means that more people will visit Taiwan and have the opportunity to see our beautiful nation.
However, the KMT and the government should not try to claim credit they don’t deserve, and especially not by linking the ROC centennial to so many outside events, thereby politicizing them. The best way for them to truly celebrate the centennial would be by showing some initiative and originality themselves. After all, they are celebrating what was a rather original idea at the time — the establishment of a democracy in Asia.
Burger King Taiwan on Wednesday last week posted an update on Facebook advertising a new “Wuhan pneumonia” (武漢肺炎) home delivery meal, catering to customers hankering for a Whopper, but who wished to avoid visiting one of its outlets. “Wuhan pneumonia” is the term commonly used in Taiwan to describe COVID-19. Beijing has been waging an extensive propaganda campaign against the use of the words “Wuhan” or “China” in reference to the novel coronavirus, calling it racist and discriminatory. Meanwhile, Chinese officials have claimed that the coronavirus might have originated in the US. The intention is obvious: to distract attention from the Chinese Communist
Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Air Force Shaanxi KJ-500 airborne early-warning aircraft and Shenyang J-11 fighters on March 16 conducted a nighttime exercise in the waters southwest of Taiwan and, in doing so, came close to the nation’s air defense identification zone. Three days later, the PLA Navy’s fleet for Gulf of Aden escort mission sailed north in the Pacific off Taiwan’s east coast via the Miyako Strait on its way home. Meanwhile, the US carried out freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea and assembled the USS Theodore Roosevelt carrier strike group with the Expeditionary Strike Group to conduct
Italy, Spain, France, the UK and the US are all depending on social distancing to fight COVID-19 and have fallen into terrible situations, with mounting positive cases and many deaths. Social distancing might flatten the curve, so that the peak is not so high that hospitals are overwhelmed with patients, the problem is that the pandemic could extend further into the future, hurt the economy more and become unbearable for society. Taiwan, South Korea, Japan and Singapore have controlled the spread of COVID-19, and the main reason is that most Asians wear masks. It can be illustrated as follows: If someone contracts the
Having returned to the UK late last year and with a Taiwanese spouse remaining in Taiwan, I have been afforded the chance to compare and contrast the UK and Taiwanese governments’ responses to the COVID-19 crisis. My early conclusions are that Taiwan benefits from a rational, competent government, which quickly recognizes, adapts to and confronts large-scale disasters. It is led by a government that does more than just talk of respecting democracy and human rights, one that is scrutinized and responds to criticism, one that is concerned about public opinion, and one that is used to dealing with emergencies on