Although the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) has been continuously revising its economic growth forecast for this year upward since November, the public’s concern about a growing disparity between rich and poor is overshadowing the government’s cheery GDP forecast.
On Thursday, the DGBAS reported strong economic growth in the second quarter and raised its full-year growth forecast to 8.24 percent, higher than the 6.14 percent predicted in May, and the highest in two decades.
The statistics agency’s GDP growth forecast was followed by a prediction from the Ministry of Economic Affairs on Friday that the amount of export orders is likely to reach a record high this year and exceed US$400 billion, compared with US$322.4 billion last year.
Also on Friday, a central bank report showed that Taiwan’s second-quarter balance of payments surplus increased 14.8 percent to US$15.38 billion from US$13.4 billion in the first quarter, and was up 30.12 percent from US$11.82 billion a year earlier, indicating that strong exports and net fund inflows have boosted the central bank’s foreign exchange reserves during the period.
Taiwan’s faster-than-expected recovery from the global financial crisis has been spurred on by both domestic investment and exports, but weakening growth in some parts of the world during the second half of this year and a still-high unemployment rate at home could pose new challenges for the economy. In addition, a rising balance of payments surplus could lead to appreciation pressure on the NT dollar, thus posing a threat to the nation’s export-reliant economy.
However, it is the growing disparity in our society that people are most concerned about, rather than GDP growth. The statistics released by the DGBAS showed that the household income gap widened last year, with the average annual disposable income of the most prosperous 20 percent of the population — those who earn around NT$1.79 million (US$56,100) — reaching 6.34 times that of the poorest 20 percent. That was the highest since 2001, when the factor was 6.39. Without factoring in the government’s social welfare subsidies and tax benefits, the gap factor surged to an all-time high of 8.22 last year.
The DGBAS said the widening wealth gap was the result of the global financial crisis, which led to record-high unemployment in Taiwan last year. That explanation is only partly true.
The growing inequality in wealth distribution has more to do with the nation’s distorted tax system, which favors the rich rather than the poor. It also has to do with the persisting practice of triangular trade, in which manufacturers receive orders in Taiwan, but produce the goods at their offshore plants in order to keep costs down and maximize profits. This practice generates jobs overseas, but it does not help the situation here. Without more jobs to help improve stagnating wages, how is it possible to see wealth distributed equitably in this country?
This problem of economic disparity has raised concerns about social justice — a growing sentiment of social injustice among people will simply lead to potential conflicts in our society. If the problem worsens, Taiwan’s economic prosperity would be nothing but a mirage as most people will see their incomes fall, and they will not be satisfied with this unfair distribution of wealth.
If the government is still too engrossed by the attractive growth figures to examine the dark side of the recent trade pact with China or to deal with the widening economic disparity by reviewing Taiwan’s industrial policies and economic structure, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is merely showing that while it knows how to win votes, it knows nothing about how to govern.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS