Recently, the hawks within China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) have been criticizing the US in statements and articles, and within a 20-day period, China held seven military exercises in the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea. Beijing has also reiterated claims to the disputed islands in the South China Sea and opposed the many large-scale military exercises the US has held in the Asia-Pacific region, including the US battle carrier flotilla which trawled along the Chinese coast. The frequency with which the US and China have been displaying their military might lately has been usual.
The tense relations between the US and China, as well as the US Navy’s patrol along the Chinese coast, show that Washington is responding to requests from its Asian allies to put a damper on Beijing’s determination to become a hegemonic power. While the US and China share common economic interests, conflicts between the two nations over various hotspots, such as the South China Sea and the Korean Peninsula, are leading to increased posturing.
To break through the chain of islands the US and Japan are using to control China, Beijing must neutralize Taiwan. China would stand to make even greater strategic gains if it could annex Taiwan, and that is why it is trying to force Taiwan to accept the “one China” principle.
However, the US does not want Taiwan to use independence to upset China, nor does it want Taiwan to become neutral or start to lean toward China, as this would spoil the US’ overall strategic interests.
Given this situation, Taiwan must understand that not only is President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leaning toward China and moving away from the US and Japan, but the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) are leaning toward the Chinese Communist Party and away from the DPP’s base. This is a highly unstable situation that could erupt at anytime.
Now even the idea that Taiwan and China should have their own interpretations of “one China” is also coming under attack. Mainland Affairs Council Minister Lai Shin-yuan (賴幸媛) recently had to make an early return to Taiwan from overseas because Beijing thought her demand that China’s “Anti-Secession” Law allowing the use of military force against Taiwan should be abolished implied that she had “ulterior motives.” Furthermore, Ma sidestepped the sensitive issue of the removal of Chinese missiles at the KMT’s recent party convention.
These developments together with the US tabling any new military arms sales to Taiwan this year, show that the relaxed cross-strait relations the Ma administration is so proud of are a result of self-denigration and defeatism.
Global Views magazine recently published an opinion poll where 47 percent of respondents said they supported the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA). However, 56 percent said they were not satisfied with the Ma administration and 66 percent said they believed there is no need for Taiwan and China to be unified. Twenty-nine percent supported independence for Taiwan. Only 15.6 percent said they supported “eventual unification,” while 69.9 percent opposed it.
These responses clearly show that Ma’s wishful, one-sided, cross-strait policies are tantamount to playing with fire because Beijing will not budge on its “one China” principle.
Given China’s all-pervading unification efforts, the already signed ECFA and the PLA’s talk of a mutual military trust mechanism bypassing sovereignty and a peace agreement based on the “one China” principle, we now have to wait and see how Ma will respond.
Lu I-ming is the former publisher and president of Taiwan’s Shin Sheng Daily News.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS