Once again the closet opens and the skeletons tumble out. Here are three of the most outwardly respectable high street stores — including one that often waves around its world-saving plan and another assumed to have got its supply chain in order following exposes of working conditions in the 1990s — connected to miserable Gurgaon garment factories.
None of the firms identified this time is a “value” retailer, but they too are in the grip of fast fashion — making on-trend designs mind-bogglingly cheap and getting them into their stores in days, rather than months. And the real cost continues to be paid by garment workers thousands of kilometers away.
Soon, London Fashion Week will signal to the fashion community that it’s time to focus on the new season. This is a quaint throwback. The fashion industry’s two seasons a year have been replaced in high street shops by 30 to 50 mini-seasons. A CMT (cut-make-trim) factory in India, Bangladesh or Cambodia must be hyper-responsive to cope with design changes from offices in Europe. A last-minute fax insisting that a button needs to be moved sends a poorly funded, badly managed factory into a panic. Third-world firms will never tell Western retail superpowers that an order is too difficult, so workers are simply told they must finish it.
Buyers for UK companies focus on keeping prices down and getting their Daisy Duke shorts into stores while the relevant celebrity is still wearing them. They also grapple with thousands of suppliers all over the world. A factory that might realistically be able to supply 20,000 pairs of jeans can suddenly be deluged by an order for 500,000. It will simply subcontract to factories of an ever-declining standard.
Attempting to uphold standards in this melee has traditionally meant a reliance on factory audits (where a representative visits and ticks safety and welfare boxes). This is thought as effective as the proverbial chocolate teapot.
The Ethical Trading Initiative, the voluntary industry body that all three companies involved here are members of, is also criticized by campaigners for being too placid.
“Ethical trade doesn’t mean that there’s a cast-iron guarantee that the person who made that T-shirt has been treated right. It’s about company behavior. It tells you they are working to improve,” initiative spokeswoman Julia Hawkins said.
Is this good enough? Not for poverty campaign group ActionAid, which thinks consumers should expect a little more.
“An essential part of any ethical trade has to be to ensure that workers are being paid a living wage. At a bare minimum, this should be enough for a worker to pay for food for her family and cover housing, education and health needs — Asian garment workers are currently being paid about half of what they need to do this,” it said.
However, Claire Hamer, a former mainstream fashion buyer credited with introducing Fairtrade fashion to Topshop, sees change on the horizon. Through her consultancy Ei8ht, she develops ethical supplies and has recently masterminded Asos Africa, a line for the online retailer produced by 24 tailors in a Kenyan cooperative.
“The future is behind the label and the story behind it, not just about the brands,” she said. “The smart fashion brands are beginning to design and buy out of these issues. I envisage a world where, when someone says ‘I love your top,’ you won’t just say, ‘Thanks, it’s from Topshop,’ you’ll take pride in knowing who made it. The value is not just in the brand, it’s in the people who made it and how it was made.”
There is clearly some way to go. When the fashion press covers ethics, it largely means whether catwalk models should eat more, rather than whether garment workers should eat at all.
It’s tempting to cast retailers as Dickensian ogres but fast fashion is driven by consumer appetites. We love fashion but we also dump 2 million tonnes of textile waste (mostly clothing) in landfill each year, which suggests we don’t value it. As consumers, we get the type of fashion retail we deserve and ask for. We need a new plan.
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS