When the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) held a demonstration on June 26 to protest the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) the Ma administration signed with Beijing, three people were conspicuous by their absence: Tainan Mayor Hsu Tain-tsair (許添財), Tainan County Commissioner Su Huan-chih (蘇煥智) and Kaohsiung County Commissioner Yang Chiu-hsing (楊秋興).
All three are party members, hold key elected positions in the south and would normally attend such a rally.
However, Hsu, Su and Yang have something else in common. They all lost bids for the party’s nomination in their respective areas for the November special municipality elections. Speculation is rife that they now intend to run as independents, thus raising the specter of a split DPP vote.
All three men deny such speculation. Hsu said he didn’t attend the march because he was “exhausted,” Su felt that the party’s position on ECFA was too vague and Yang had voiced displeasure with the party and criticized Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu (陳菊) during primaries for the party nomination in Greater Kaohsiung, which she won.
It may be that the other two, like Yang, feel jilted after years of loyal and valuable service. Whatever their grievances, the party has a problem, one that DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) must deal with and soon.
While the south is generally considered a DPP stronghold, previous elections have shown this strength to be more apparent than real. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has always run a close second, even winning on occasion. Indeed, Chen’s margin of victory in the 2006 race was a mere 0.14 percent, not much of a cushion if a disaffected Yang chooses to play spoiler in November.
While the chances of an independent mounting a successful campaign are slim, a few percentage points could easily undo the DPP in one or more of the special municipality elections.
Tsai can do two things to resolve this problem. First, she can recognize the contributions of Hsu, Su and Yang and perhaps offer appointments either within the municipal administrations should the DPP candidates win or elsewhere in the party. It may be that their no-show at the ECFA demonstration was intended to elicit such a response. However, all three have proven themselves more than capable in the past and keeping them firmly within the party fold is as important as keeping them out of the upcoming elections.
In the event that appeasement fails and one of the three does decide to go rogue, Tsai should be prepared to denounce that person in no uncertain terms, thus reaffirming party solidarity and mobilizing voter support against betrayal from within.
This may sound melodramatic, but a split in DPP ranks going into the fall election season risks making the party look weak and divided, an especially dangerous situation coming on the heels of significant KMT victories on legislation and international affairs — the ECFA being at the top of the list — and the KMT’s current strength must not be underestimated, even in the south.
This is doubly true for Tsai. Recently re-elected to the DPP’s top post and running her first campaign for office, her chances in the Sinbei mayoral race have shown promise in the last few weeks, but this could change quickly if she is perceived to be unable to manage her own party.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS