There has been much talk about the wave of worker suicides at Foxconn’s Longhua factory in Shenzhen recently. While it appears that the issue has caused trouble for its founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), what may become more evident is that it also signals that Taiwanese companies operating across the Taiwan Strait are facing growing challenges as China attempts to modernize its economy.
Over the past two to three decades, many Taiwanese companies have relocated to China because of the lower costs of land and labor. Through the use of China as the “factory of the world,” these firms have been able to ship products to many other countries and build up their businesses with great success.
Foxconn, known in Taiwan by the name of its parent, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, is not just one of these successful Taiwanese businesses; it is perhaps the most successful one. It is also the world’s largest contract maker of electronic products, thanks to its ability to control costs and improve efficiency, as well as Gou’s stringent work ethic.
However, the same factors that have been key to Foxconn’s strength and that of many of its Taiwanese peers in China are now obstacles to further progress. They seem to face a bottleneck in at least three ways.
First, many Taiwanese firms that have long relied on China’s ample labor supply and low wages are now faced with a severe shortage of migrant workers in some of China’s coastal provinces and a demand for higher minimum wages by some local governments there.
Foxconn announced on Friday it would increase wages for its Chinese factory workers and accelerate plans to start operations in inland provinces. This might be the company’s immediate response to the spate of suicides, but by doing so it can help the company deal with the migrant worker problem in the longer term. However, unlike Foxconn and other large companies, small Taiwanese companies will continue to face problems under financial constraints.
Second, contract manufacturing has enabled Taiwanese companies to focus on efficient manufacturing in their scale and price competition with rivals. However, a major drawback of this business mode is the extremely small profit margin compared with branded products. Without sufficient investment in brand building, innovative design and technological research and development, Taiwanese contract manufacturers will continue to find it difficult to exit from this perennially low-margin business.
Third, like other multinational companies in China, it appears to be a problem for Taiwanese firms to manage their employees there when their operations become bigger. For Foxconn, a firm that employs more than 800,000 people in China, personnel management is much more difficult than product management.
Moreover, businesses these days tend to emphasize a performance-driven, discipline-oriented system within a cutthroat competitive environment. However, businesses in China also have to pay extra attention to accelerating societal and cultural changes as the country transitions from a command economy to a socialist market economy.
Amid worries about a contagion effect from the recent spate of suicides at Foxconn, the company and the local governments should take more steps to deal with the problem responsibly, although there are no simple, short-term solutions to a complex social problem like suicide. From a long-term perspective, however, this mishap indicates that Taiwanese businesses are facing a dilemma about how to transform their business mode to cope with China’s changes.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization