The recent debate between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) on the issue of signing an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China has led to a great deal of discussion throughout society. Indeed, Ma’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) would probably have advertised its surprise victory more widely had celebrations not been cut short by a tragic landslide on Freeway No. 3 close to Keelung.
While the central focus of the Ma-Tsai debate was the ECFA, the key issue underlying almost every talking point was how to deal with China. Will Taiwan adopt an attitude of Taiwanization, Sinification or globalization when defining itself and conducting relations with China? In determining an answer to that question, we need to decide how to view China’s past, present and future.
Although the future is unpredictable, it can still be imagined, planned for and realized. The science of future studies encourages people to develop foresight, but it does not guarantee accuracy. While the power to predict future events may seem unduly abstract, it is an integral part of everyday life, but most people are not accustomed to applying this ability to issues of great importance or matters that lie in the distant future.
People predict the future every day in a very natural way. For example, before leaving home, we all make predictions about the weather and traffic. Only human beings have the ability to simultaneously remember the past, be conscious of the present and predict the future.
However, there are varying viewpoints about these three different ways of viewing time. Some people get stuck in the past, while some make the most of the present and others place all their hopes on the future. These different perspectives lead to differences in cognition and individual opinions. The power of the future is to be found in its ability to appropriately integrate these three concepts of time.
We need to adopt a forward-looking attitude when dealing with China. Although China’s rise to global prominence is a widely recognized geopolitical fact, there are different opinions as to whether this will be peaceful. There are those who say that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is totalitarian in nature, that it detests democracy and that it will never change. These people believe that as long as the CCP is in charge, China must be shunned, while some even say that world peace can only be preserved by opposing China.
Such opinions are the logical result of taking the CCP’s past actions and extending them into the future. The DPP is clearly suspicious of China, an attitude largely based on past experience.
At the other end of the spectrum, there are people who view things totally in terms of the future and therefore consider the DPP approach to be closed-minded.
Ma’s attitude is to look only at the future, paying no attention to events that have happened in the past in China, and choosing to ignore extremist attitudes China has demonstrated toward Taiwan and the rest of the world.
US psychologists Philip Zimbardo and John Boyd refer to such people as being concerned with a “transcendental future.” They pursue a beautiful, imagined future for which they plan. Such individuals are able to disregard the present and give up on past achievements for that imagined future.
RSS