Climate change prevention
Since “climategate” was publicized at the Copenhagen conference in November last year, the attitude of the general public has sparked a conspicuous shift on the issue of climate change. According to the results of a Gallup poll released last month, a large number of Americans believe the importance of global warming has been magnified by some scientists. The percentage of respondents who said there are exaggerations went up from 30 percent in 2006 to 41 percent last year and 48 percent this year, according to the Taipei Times (“Fear-mongering on climate change,” April 1, page 8).
However, it is definitely true that serious natural catastrophes have been taking place more frequently worldwide during the past decade. In Taiwan, Typhoon Morakot, which devastated the Kaohsiung area in August last year, is a memory of acute grievance for Taiwanese.
In fact, our country is suffering from serious natural threats, such as rising sea levels, gradual water shortages and decreasing fish stocks. Even though we cannot predict how harmful the greenhouse effect to the planet is going to be in the immediate future, we should still deal with the most fundamental cause of climate change — large-scale carbon dioxide emissions and other destructive human activities.
There are many pragmatic ways to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions we produce, such as carpooling, making use of public transportation, improving the use of pastures and reforestation.
Another alarming hazard related to climate change affects insect pollination, such as the honey bee colony collapse, which has begun to threaten the successful pollination of billions of dollars of crops in the US. How to prevent the spread of these diseases is also a crucial issue in relation to climate change.
We in Taiwan should live up to our responsibility for the preservation of our planet as well as safeguarding the future of our children. For Taiwan, Morakot has taught us a severe lesson.
CLAIRE WU
Taipei County
Purpose of learning English
The Ministry of Education (MOE) needs to take a serious look at the purpose of learning English. If the purpose is to fulfill a lame university entrance requirement, or to pass a test, then the MOE doesn’t really need to alter the current curriculum. If the purpose of learning English is to be able to meaningfully communicate with another person, however, the MOE needs to revise the curriculum from the beginning.
If I were hiring, and had two applicants, one with a usable vocabulary of only 500 words, but who wasn’t afraid of using them, and the other with a testable vocabulary of 10,000 words, but was too shy to open his or her mouth, I would hire the first one in a heartbeat.
The MOE needs to understand that less is more. Teaching a smaller vocabulary and spending more time on learning to say the words clearly and to use them in various situations is the way to advance students’ useable English skills.
The MOE could cut the vocabulary in half, for the time being, thus giving more time to speech practice. Over time, the environment for reinforcement outside the English classroom would be built and the MOE could then gradually increase the vocabulary of the lessons.
I don’t think the MOE has clear goals or a plan of any sort on how to make English relevant in students’ lives. At the moment, outside of the large cities, there is no environment for reinforcement of English learning.
Students eagerly learn things they feel are relevant, hence the great interest in computer classes. The MOE needs to go beyond the present cursory attempt to make textbooks relevant and make English something truly relevant and of use.
Until the MOE deliberately sets down a clear purpose and step-by-step goals that are reachable by the majority of students, and not some idealized fantasy student or privileged student, the state of English education in Taiwan will always be something of a mess.
SHERVIN MARSH
Luodung
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China