Putting children at risk
What a fat lot of good Taiwan’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was during the dust storm that hit the country on March 21.
You would have thought when Taiwan’s air pollution levels became “hazardous” — the official term used for the most severe level of pollution, right above “very unhealthy” — it would do more than merely advise people not to go outside unless it was necessary.
I was astounded that the EPA apparently did not inform the Ministry of Education (MOE) of the danger posed to children’s health. The MOE could then have instructed schools to keep children indoors until the air quality was no longer hazardous.
The next morning, air pollution was still at a hazardous level and yet at my son’s elementary school, PE teachers were having basketball practice outside as usual. Either they did not know, or did not care, just how severe the pollution was.
Most teachers and parents don’t go to the EPA Web site to look at the numbers, so it’s up to the EPA to tell the MOE when kids should be kept indoors. An official notification from the MOE, based on advice from the EPA, could have avoided unnecessarily exposing children to incredibly and hazardously high levels of fine particles.
PETER WILDS
Taichung City
Joining the big leagues
Recently, I read the news in a local paper that the FTSE Group is considering upgrading Taiwan’s stock market to a developed market. I am very excited about this, but there are a few issues that I believe are particularly important before we celebrate this potential move.
The first concerns the widely known exchange rate manipulation and capital flow issues in Taiwan. I believe the label of developed market shouldn’t just be a one-way street; rather, there should be mutual gains.
The ability to foster regional capital flows and improve market efficiency should also be part of the assessment criteria, in addition to local regulations and advanced trading systems.
Although some argue Hong Kong’s fixed exchange rate regime is counterproductive, Hong Kong’s market-friendly regulations and flexible capital flows more than compensate for its inflexible exchange rate regime.
The second issue concerns the proposal to raise the daily stock-trading limit from seven to 10 percent. Most retail investors are not required to have deposits in their accounts before placing trades and are only required to settle the accounts within the next two trading days for single stock orders of less than 100, with a 50 percent deposit required for orders exceeding 100 shares.
This contrasts with developed markets, where trading accounts need to be fully funded before orders can be processed unless they are made by large institutions and routed through brokers.
This needs to be modified before upgrading the TAIEX. If not, the market will surely be too risky for local retail investors. As it stands, the settlement process — an unreasonably risky one — helps the brokerage firms to draw in businesses, as the current process is equivalent to providing two free days of credit to investors.
I believe these two important issues are being overlooked. The FTSE’s proposed upgrading of the TAIEX is a good opportunity to make changes that will protect investors. Other modifications under consideration to help investors improve their risk monitoring are also welcome.
We must avoid a blind rush to join the developed market league. We should include wider considerations and ask ourselves whether the benefits outweigh the costs of relaxing capital flow regulations, a widening of the NT dollar trading band and changes to how brokers manage settlements.
These concerns must be addressed to protect investors before we make the charge to join the financial big leagues.
JIMMY CHAIWEI CHIU
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry