China is strongly motivated to develop its own thin-film transistor (TFT) LCD and wafer foundry industries, and hopes it can gain production technology and managerial know-how from Taiwan. In order to please China, President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government has decided to sign an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with Beijing as soon as possible.
Last month, restrictions on Taiwanese companies establishing TFT-LCD plants in China using 6.5 generation technology and above were relaxed. Firms were also allowed to invest in 12-inch wafer fabs and establish operations for mid to high-level integrated circuit testing and packaging.
This will spur the relocation of the two main pillars of Taiwan’s electronics industry to China. Once an ECFA is signed, Taiwan’s electronics industry will fade away and as many as 750,000 workers will face unemployment.
The only restriction the Ma administration placed on this opening up of Taiwan’s electronics sector was that the production technology for wafer fabs in China lags two generations behind Taiwan’s. While it may sound like this seeks to minimize the loss of Taiwan’s cutting-edge technology to China, it is in fact a sure way to hand over technological know-how to China.
To use the example of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) and its investment in China’s Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), SMIC has announced that it has already started using 45 nanometer process technology like TSMC does, so does this mean that TSMC will not be allowed to invest in SMIC in future?
In addition, there is a two-generation gap between Taiwan’s United Microelectronics Corp (UMC) and China’s Hejian Technology, which UMC wishes to acquire.
If this happens and Hejian increases its production technology to the same level as UMC’s, does that mean UMC will have to pull out of Hejian? Of course it won’t. So in reality, the two-generation gap in technology is just to dupe the public.
Many have stated that once an ECFA takes effect, trade tariffs between Taiwan and China will drop sharply. However, cutting tariffs will not be beneficial to Taiwan’s exports of electronic components to China because most electronics products now exported from Taiwan to China, like semiconductors, are already almost tariff-free. The average rate is 0.58 percent.
That means Taiwanese businesses will not lose much at all if an ECFA isn’t signed, while the passage of an ECFA would not really help them expand their business in China.
Even more worrying is that once an ECFA is signed, Taiwanese businesses will be able to invest even more in China’s high-tech industry than they do now. Because of industrial clustering, middle and upstream LCD and IC manufacturers will make big moves into China. For example, when Taiwan’s PC and notebook businesses were allowed to start production in China in the 1990s, manufacturers quickly moved to China. This caused the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs in Taiwan.
The IC design industry has the highest value-added industry in Taiwan, so inevitably design development and staff will flow to China, causing the gradual death of the domestic electronics industry.
The knowledge and experience accumulated by Taiwan’s electronics sector will cease to exist here. What industries will we be left with to provide employment in Taiwan and what sort of production technology will allow us to engage in high value-added industries?
Chien Yao-tang is a member of Taiwan Thinktank.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS