Forced vaccinations
I have lived in Taiwan for more than five years as a teacher and writer. Recently, when receiving my health check results for my ARC, I was told there was a problem.
Apparently, my measles antibodies were low and I was told that I would have to receive an MMR vaccine shot at a cost of NT$600 in order to pass my medical.
This is absolutely ridiculous. Medically, there is no reason at all why I would ever need a booster shot unless I was going to a place rife with this disease. The immunity stays with you all your life.
I became quite sick because of this injection and still am; however, I was prepared to believe that mine was an isolated case.
However, when I went to work I found out that two other teachers who did their health check were also forced into having the MMR vaccine. I am appalled at this.
In the UK there is a huge political issue regarding the safety of the MMR vaccine, with horror stories about the side effects many experience.
I absolutely did not want to have this vaccine, but it seems that Renai Hospital is forcing people into taking it, at a cost, or they will not be allowed to renew their ARC.
If three teachers at my small school experienced this, I am quite sure others have, too.
TOM LEEMING
Taipei
Cure worse than disease
I was awe-struck to read the Taipei Times article that quoted President Ma Yiing-jeou’s (馬英九) words of Monday, Feb. 22: “Ma touts the signing of an ECFA” (Feb. 23, page 3).
Ma’s ability to dissemble and audaciously lie leaves me speechless.
And the irony! The level of irony in Ma’s “speech” could only be called “Sophoclean.”
Whenever I think of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) that the Ma administration intends to sign with China in May (all without the Taiwanese public, or even the legislature having any say whatsoever on the matter), an ancient Greek word, pharmakon, comes to mind.
The Greeks used this word to refer both to a poison’s antidote and to the poison itself. Pharmakon referred both to a poison or disease, and to its cure.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) would have the public believe that an ECFA is a quasi-panacea, when it is precisely the opposite: it is an utterly destructive malignancy. Its “benefits” will lie in its inextricably dragging Taiwan into a sphere of absolute dependency on China.
Once economic vassalage is achieved, a political anschluss (forced annexation) will soon be imposed upon the people of Taiwan.
This annexation will occur during Ma’s second term; and if anyone is naive enough to think that the KMT (not to mention China) have the intention of allowing for the slightest possibility that the DPP will somehow regain power in the 2012 elections, then they are indeed either blind or are like ostriches with their heads in the sand.
Ma is quoted singing the same chorus as he always sings.
That is to say that he promises not to allow Chinese workers or any more Chinese agricultural products to enter the domestic market in Taiwan.
The crucial question to ask oneself is: How good is Ma at keeping his promises? Is he reliable and trustworthy enough that Taiwanese can depend on him to keep his word?
Taiwanese elected Ma based largely on his economic promises, the most famous of which was his so-called “6-3-3” plan — a “plan” for 6 percent economic growth, an average per capita income of US$30,000 and less than 3 percent unemployment.
Then, on being elected, Ma had the unmitigated gall to claim that this “plan” of his had to be considered as a form of IOU; Ma told the people that they would need to defer their expectations until his second term.
One need only consider how Ma so shamelessly clings to the pathetic, so-called “1992 consensus” to evaluate his integrity (or utter lack thereof).
Ma also stated at Monday’s luncheon that, as president, his goal was to create opportunities for Taiwanese, thus ensuring both their basic survival and their development in the international community, which would earn them respect.
Ma is then quoted as stating: “If I cannot do that, I don’t deserve to be president.”
This is a paradigmatic, textbook example of Sophoclean irony.
The irony of it is enough to bowl a person over and induce paroxysms of scornful laughter.
Ma goes on to state: “When a leader does what he is supposed to do, he should be considered bold and resolute in action, don’t you think?”
So, Ma fancies himself as a “bold and resolute” leader, does he?
Ma is many things, but he most definitely is neither bold nor resolute in action.
So, the people of Taiwan themselves must be both bold and resolute; they must do everything in their power to prevent Ma’s administration from signing an ECFA with China.
They must forcefully reject and repudiate Ma’s absurd idea that Taiwan must “take China into consideration when reaching out to the world.”
Such toadyism and capitulation is merely a recipe for disaster.
MICHAEL SCANLON
East Hartford, Connecticut
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused