Five months after the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) swept to power promising that politicians would wrench control of policy from bureaucrats, critics are wondering: Where are the politicians headed now that they’re in charge?
Analysts say Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama’s government is on the right track in trying to shift spending from wasteful public works to “soft infrastructure” such as childcare and education.
But they also complain of a failure to set priorities or spell out the path from lofty goals to coherent plans.
“It was OK [to have piecemeal policies] when they were in opposition and trying to convince the public to give them a chance, but now that they are in power, they need a concrete, coordinated vision and policies,” said Hidenori Suezawa, chief strategist at Nikko Cordial Securities.
Many experts agree that while a policy process dominated by bureaucrats worked well when Japan’s goal was to catch up with the West, it has faltered when faced with more modern challenges.
The Democrats inherited a raft of deep problems including an aging population, an economy that only managed to grow about 1 percent annually over the past two decades and a public debt nearing 200 percent of GDP after repeated stimulus packages.
Now the government is trying to flesh out a strategy by June to achieve average annual growth of more than 2 percent over the next decade, along with a mid-term plan for reining in the debt.
Concerns about future bond issuance have kept investors from aggressively buying long-term Japanese government bonds, while doubts about the growth strategy dampen appetite for Japanese shares.
But skeptics wonder how much credibility the mid-term plans will have, given the ruling bloc’s desire to avoid difficult issues ahead of an upper house election expected in July, as well as political leaders’ lack of expertise on economic matters.
Japanese Finance Minister Naoto Kan has taken a pragmatic step by calling for debate on Japan’s 5 percent sales tax, but Hatoyama is sticking to a pledge not to raise the politically sensitive tax until the next general election, mandated by late 2013.
“They shouldn’t leave it all to bureaucrats, but within the DPJ government they need to decide their stance toward economic and fiscal policy. I think they are very weak on that aspect,” said Yoshihiro Katayama, a former reformist governor who is now a member of a government panel discussing fiscal reform. “The current administration at this time is entirely focused on the election. Their big goal is to win in the upper house election, and what they do after they win is secondary.”
Hatoyama’s Democrats trounced the long-dominant Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in a lower house election last year, but now need to win an outright majority in an upper house poll expected in July, or risk policy paralysis.
But a funding scandal embroiling a ruling party kingpin, and doubts about Hatoyama’s leadership have pushed the government’s ratings below 40 percent, clouding the chances of a decisive win.
Central to the Democrats’ platform is a package of steps including child allowances and free high-school education intended to put more money in consumers’ hands to boost domestic economic growth as well as encourage people to have children.
Because of falling tax revenues the government has already abandoned a pledge to end a gasoline surcharge and has yet to persuade critics it can find permanent sources of funding for other measures, which will cost ¥14.3 trillion (US$159 billion) by 2013-2014.
“They talk about a ‘welfare nation,’ but if you want to raise the level of government services, you have to discuss where you are going to get the funds and who will bear that burden,” Suezawa said. “But from the start, they were lacking that aspect, because their starting point was to criticize the ruling party.”
Critics suggest the Democrats could benefit by drafting professionals to help craft their policies.
“They are amateurs when it comes to the economy,” Suezawa said.
Hatoyama, 63, the rich grandson of a former prime minister, has a doctorate in engineering, while Kan is a former grassroots activist who made his name uncovering a tainted blood scandal as health minister.
The Democrats have not been been idle.
After passing an extra budget for the fiscal year to March 31 to prop up the economy, they now look set to enact a record US$1 trillion budget for 2010-2011. That budget will slice public works spending by 18.3 percent and boost funds for social security by 9.8 percent and for education, culture and science by 5.2 percent.
Economists applaud such efforts, but say shifts in spending priorities could take up to a decade to show effect.
Voters, however, may not want to wait so long.
“With declining polls, they have to deliver the fruits of political change, and that is very hard,” Sophia University professor Koichi Nakano said. “It is not going to be easy for the Democrats to claim a majority on their own.”
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS