The US recently announced an arms sales package including five items requested by Taiwan but excluding advanced F-16C/D fighter planes and diesel-electric submarines. Academics and think tanks in Taiwan and abroad perceived as early as August that US Navy policymakers planned to change their policy on the submarine sale. On Dec. 15, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lin Yu-fang (林郁方) publicly stated that the US, having assessed the situation and to avoid the massive cost of reopening the production line, was likely to suggest that Taiwan build smaller coastal submarines not equipped with air-independent propulsion.
On Jan. 4, Defense News said the US might agree to conduct a first-stage feasibility assessment for providing diesel-electric submarines. Based on this, some concluded that Washington was likely to approve sale of diesel-electric subs in the package, because that would be a compromise based on the US’ external environment and interests.
It would reduce the sensitivity of the issue so as not to “irritate” China. It could keep its promise to Taiwan. Lastly, it would avoid protest from civic groups that would be provoked by the sale of nuclear-powered submarines.
Many believe the package will have little impact on Sino-US or cross-strait relations, since it is limited to defensive weapons or replacing existing systems and will not significantly improve Taiwan’s deterrence capability. Mei Fu-hsing (梅復興), director of the US-based Taiwan Strait Security Research and Analysis Center, commented bluntly that the five-item package is no more than a “stock clearance sale” that was already approved by former US president George W. Bush.
As for F-16C/D fighter jets and diesel-electric submarines, Taipei’s representative to Washington Jason Yuan (袁健生) said the US has not really excluded the prospect and that a decision would be made after completion of an evaluation report on Taiwan’s and China’s relative military strengths. In other words, the US is probably testing the waters before Chinese President Hu Jintao’s (胡錦濤) visit in April and intends to use the issue as a bargaining chip for follow-up negotiations.
Few items among Taiwan’s past arms purchases had great deterrent effect. As Brian Kennedy, president of the Claremont Institute, said in an opinion piece in the Jan. 10 issue of the Wall Street Journal, US arms sales to Taiwan are inadequate and if the US really wants to help Taiwan it should sell it more advanced weapons.
Tamkang University professor Chen I-hsin (陳一新), meanwhile, said that China has taken a series of steps in protest at US arms sales to Taiwan and the main aim of these measures has been to deter the US from selling Taiwan diesel-electric submarines, since diesel-electric submarines pose a bigger threat to China than F-16C/D fighters.
For Taiwan, the defense value of the submarines would lie in their ability to link up with and complement US forces by patrolling coastal waters within the first Pacific island chain in which the presence of US vessels would be too sensitive. Also, following September’s US-Taiwan Defense Industry Conference in Charlottesville, Virginia, the US side let it be known that it was Taiwan’s government that wanted to block the diesel-electric submarine deal. In view of the position taken on this issue by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the KMT when it was in opposition, it can be seen that the government’s position is far from clear-cut.
It is unwise to keep delaying such a key item. Whether the government wants to go through with the deal or not, it should set out a clear plan and give the public a proper explanation.
Wang Jyh-perng is an associate research fellow at the Association for Managing Defense and Strategies.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG AND JULIAN CLEGG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.