Milton Friedman, recipient of the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1976, once said: “If you want to see capitalism in action, go to Hong Kong.” Hong Kong was handed over to China in 1997 under the “one country, two systems” principle, with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) saying it would maintain the territory’s capitalist system and way of life unchanged for 50 years.
For the last 13 years, Hong Kong has, on the surface, remained unchanged, but in real terms, conditions are already changing. Based on the annual Index of Economic Freedom report compiled by the Wall Street Journal and the Heritage Foundation, while Hong Kong has kept its high level of economic freedom, the system is in fact rotten.
This became more evident after Hong Kong signed the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA) with China in 2003. With Hong Kong’s economy falling under CCP control, the overall environment and quality of life in the territory deteriorated, the rich-poor gap widened and social problems worsened. Not long ago, a CNN feature showed 19 Hong Kong residents squeezed into a 58m² “cage-like home,” drawing a stark contrast with the territory’s astronomically expensive luxury mansions.
Last October, BusinessWeek cited a report by the UN Development Program that said Hong Kong’s rich-poor gap, based on the Gini coefficient, was the widest among the world’s advanced economies. Generally, a coefficient of 0.4 is seen as a warning sign: Hong Kong already shot past this level by scoring 0.434. The report also said Hong Kong has both a large number of extremely wealthy people and the world’s biggest public housing sector. Moreover, other than foreign workers, workers in the territory do not enjoy minimum wages.
Aside from the economic drop-off, political freedoms have fared even worse. General elections for chief executive and members of the Legislative Council and Executive Council have repeatedly been postponed. Hong Kong also blindly follows Beijing’s lead in issuing entry permits. For instance, six key members of the US-based Shen Yun Performing Arts (神韻藝術團) troupe were refused visas at the last moment last week, forcing the entire group to cancel seven sold-out performances.
Taiwanese should pay close attention to Hong Kong as it serves an example of what could happen here if the government continued to desperately seek an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China. The current economic recovery already reflects this — a stock market awash in funds and speculation in the housing market.
Taiwan’s richest 20 percent continues to be more than six times wealthier than the poorest 20 percent. Its Gini coefficient hovers between 0.34 and 0.35, unemployment is near 6 percent and wage hikes in the industrial and service sectors since 1991 have lagged significantly behind economic growth figures. Since 2000, salary growth has slowed further and even begun to drop. Aside from rising housing prices, there has also been an influx of hot money from abroad. It is hard to imagine what will happen if these problems are compounded by massive amounts of Chinese investment.
More importantly, the reason Hong Kong has been able to maintain the appearance of “one country, two systems” is that Taiwan has not yet fallen into the CCP’s hands. As soon as Taiwan becomes a special administrative region like Hong Kong and Macau, the three and China will become “one system” — the CCP-controlled Chinese system. We must ask ourselves if we are willing to see this happen.
Wu Hui-lin is a researcher at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
With each passing day, the threat of a People’s Republic of China (PRC) assault on Taiwan grows. Whatever one’s view about the history, there is essentially no question that a PRC conquest of Taiwan would mark the end of the autonomy and freedom enjoyed by the island’s 23 million people. Simply put, the PRC threat to Taiwan is genuinely existential for a free, democratic and autonomous Taiwan. Yet one might not know it from looking at Taiwan. For an island facing a threat so acute, lethal and imminent, Taiwan is showing an alarming lack of urgency in dramatically strengthening its defenses.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US
I still remember the first time I heard about the possibility of an invasion by China. I was six years old. I thought war was coming and hid in my bed, scared. After 18 years, the invasion news tastes like a sandwich I eat every morning. As a Gen Z Taiwanese student who has witnessed China’s harassment for more than 20 years, I want to share my opinion on China. Every generation goes through different events. I have seen not only the norms of China’s constant presence, but also the Sunflower movement, wars and people fighting over peace or equality,
The people of Taiwan recently received confirmation of the strength of American support for their security. Of four foreign aid bills that Congress passed and President Biden signed in April, the bill legislating additional support for Taiwan garnered the most votes. Three hundred eighty-five members of the House of Representatives voted to provide foreign military financing to Taiwan versus only 34 against. More members of Congress voted to support Taiwan than Ukraine, Israel, or banning TikTok. There was scant debate over whether the United States should provide greater support for Taiwan. It was understood and broadly accepted that doing so