Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) declared on Monday that the government would not raise National Health Insurance premiums for the time being, dismissing Department of Health Minister Yaung Chih-liang’s (楊志良) comments over the past few weeks that the department would raise premiums this year — possibly before the start of the Lunar New Year holiday.
Criticizing the shortcomings of the DOH’s premium adjustment plan, Wu instructed the department to review its plan, provide more details on remedying the insurance system’s financial woes and ensure that at least half of the population be spared from the planned premium hike. Wu also reminded Yaung to refrain from making public comments before a policy is finalized.
For weeks, Yaung had talked about hiking premiums to help resolve the National Health Insurance Program’s NT$60 billion (US$1.88 billion) deficit. The plan met with wide opposition, however, with many criticizing the government for lacking sensitivity to the plight of the public as the nation struggles to recover from a recession.
Yaung has said the proposal would better address premium payments by different income levels by lowering the insurance premium rate for the bottom 25 percent of the wealth pyramid to 4.5 percent, while raising the rate for those in the top 25 percent to 5.5 percent. Other than telling the public to cough up more money, however, isn’t there a better way for the DOH to fill the gap?
It’s no secret that Taipei owes the national healthcare system more than NT$34 billion, while Kaohsiung owes NT$16 billion — which has taken a heavy toll on the national system. While the Kaohsiung City Government has proposed paying the central government by installment, the Taipei City Government has refused to pay its debt. Wouldn’t it make more sense for the DOH to collect the debt owed by these local governments before going after the public’s hard-earned money?
Maybe Yaung has forgotten his promise when he assumed the DOH post last August. “The Taipei City Government must pay its debt or the National Health Insurance’s finances will collapse sooner or later,” he said at the time, adding that the city’s debt was the bureau’s biggest problem.
Wu’s intervention was welcomed as he asked the DOH to thoroughly assess ways to reform the insurance system and seek other ways to resolve its financial problems before forcing the public to cover its debts.
The premier’s statement should be read carefully, however, because he did not promise that there would be no increase in the insurance premium, but rather that the rate adjustment would be put off “for the time being.”
With the month-end’s legislative by-elections looming, a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators had slammed Yaung’s planned premium hike, saying it would hurt the party’s electoral showing. One can’t help but wonder then if the premier’s announcement of a temporary halt in plans to raise premiums was done out of concern for public welfare — or the KMT’s?
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS