In recent days and weeks, the central bank has been busy refuting market rumors and media speculation that its repeated warnings on inflows of hot money and its checks on banks’ foreign-exchange transactions and forward trades have caused a decline on the stock market.
For its part, the central bank has done what it is required to do to safeguard the nation’s economy, monetary policy and price stability in the long term, although its recent rhetoric did have a direct impact on the exchange rate of the New Taiwan dollar and indirectly on the stock market. Make no mistake, the currency markets can impact equity markets in various ways — and vice versa.
Indeed, the growing uncertainty surrounding the world’s major economies’ monetary policies, international fund flows and exchange rates will likely lead to considerable volatility in global stock and commodity markets this year. Many investors are worried about governments potentially withdrawing stimulus measures and central banks possibly tightening monetary policy.
The global financial crisis has not only reshaped the world’s financial system and influenced policymakers’ attitude toward financial problems, but also changed the relationships between governments and central banks.
The announcement that US Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke would stay for a second term, the conflict between resigning Argentine central bank president Martin Redrado and Argentine President Cristina Fernandez and South Korea’s decision to send a vice minister to a central bank board meeting for the first time in more than 10 years all suggest increased political influence on central banks.
Taiwan is no exception, although in a more subdued way.
Like its global peers, Taiwan’s central bank will have to make a decision on when to raise interest rates and implement other credit-tightening measures to keep inflation in check, but that move will surely meet with corporate opposition, especially from property developers, who will face higher borrowing costs.
On the other hand, the central bank also needs to pursue a monetary policy that is anti-inflationary, counter-cyclical and able to balance the needs of exporters and importers, as well as of average income earners and big business.
The truth is, the central bank is not all-powerful and that is why economists have long supported a central bank that is independent and able to defend its credibility in the face of market and political pressure.
An amendment to the Organic Act of the Executive Yuan (行政院組織法), approved by the legislature earlier this month, however, has raised concern about the independence of the central bank, as it stipulates that the bank is a subordinate agency under the Executive Yuan, instead of an independent institution.
The central bank has immediately defended its independence on monetary policy issues following the amendment’s legislative passage, citing the Central Bank Act (中央銀行法).
The track record of Governor Perng Fai-nan (彭淮南) — who has been in the post since February 1998 — shows that he is not concerned about market and political pressure, but supporters of the central bank’s independence are concerned about the long-term consequences of the amendment, especially when the central bank is under a leader other than Perng.
Will future governments have the same respect for the central bank’s “independence” after the passage of this amendment?
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS