The Control Yuan moved to impeach Prosecutor-General Chen Tsung-ming (陳聰明), hoping to secure rapid disciplinary action. Chen circumvented the issue by resigning not long after the impeachment motion was passed. This solved the problem for Minister of Justice Wang Ching-feng (王清峰) and President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). Ma, who was facing criticism from supporters for not moving quickly enough on Chen, dealt with his resignation summarily. And with that, he drew a line under the whole sorry affair.
Nothing that Chen has been involved in since he took up his position has attracted so much attention as the corruption case brought against former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁).
Ironically enough, it was the attention that this case attracted that led to Chen Tsung-ming’s stepping down, a victim of association with a persona non grata.
Heading the prosecutorial system is sure to attract court attention. The director-general is expected to have legal expertise and a wealth of experience to draw on, but there are other indispensable aspects to the job: integrity, morals and an untarnished image. The Control Yuan’s decision to impeach Chen Tsung-ming made his position untenable, so his resignation was no surprise. Politicians of all stripes differed on whether they had the political authority to get involved in the impeachment case, but they did agree on one thing — there was much reluctance to commend Chen Tsung-ming on his performance.
That does not necessarily mean it was right to topple Chen Tsung-ming. It also leads to another question: What is to be done about the long-term malaise afflicting the prosecutorial system?
Problems are rife: leaking confidential information and thereby compromising procedural integrity during investigations; indiscriminate prosecution, especially if a court hands down an inconvenient non-guilty verdict in the first instance; pandering to the media when choosing whom to prosecute; and tailoring one’s conduct to the media, playing to its whims and courting favor by subscribing to a pro-blue agenda, without due regard to getting to the truth of the case. All these actions compromise the credibility of the system. Each one of them will have to be addressed if we are to reform the judicial system.
Ma came into office on the promise of such reform. He is almost halfway through his term and he has done nothing to that end. To date, the only evidence of his promised reform has been to install computer screens outside the court so people can have access to the interrogation transcripts. And even this has nothing to do with Ma.
Wang is never out of the news, talking about the state of the prosecutorial system and how she will make sure things get done soon. It’s a shame. This kind of talk, followed by an endless stream of reports, sounds hollower as time goes on.
If Wang doesn’t do anything positive soon, people are going to lose hope that reform will ever materialize.
The Control Yuan has succeeded in getting Chen Tsung-ming to step down. However, the problems inherent in the prosecutorial system will not disappear with him. If these are not addressed, it will be impossible to restore credibility in the system.
It is true, as Wang has said, that Chen Tsung-ming ‘s conduct damaged the system, but it will take more than just words to fix it. She is still at a loss with what to do about existing problems. I’m afraid this is not simply going to add to Ma’s problems, it might even be the end of him.
Of course, reform does not just stop at ousting Chen Tsung-ming. There is a lot more work to do if we are to repair the damage that has been done.
Lin Feng-jeng is executive director of the Judicial Reform Foundation.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS