My electoral district includes Taipei’s Tianmu area, where many foreigners reside. However, in recent years, the number of foreign residents has gradually decreased and stores relying mainly on business with them are closing. In schools catering mainly to the children of foreign residents, many students are Taiwanese who hold foreign passports.
Taiwan has long said it wants to become an Asia-Pacific Regional Operations Center. But apart from foreign blue-collar workers, fewer foreigners are seen at the airports. The number of foreign business travelers and the amount of foreign investment have almost halved, and those who care about Taiwan’s overall economic development are deeply worried.
Friends at both the American Chamber of Commerce (AmCham) and the European Chamber of Commerce (ECCT), say many foreigners are reluctant to leave the city, saying that Taipei has numerous advantages compared with other cities in the region, such as Hong Kong, Beijing, Shanghai, Singapore or even Tokyo.
It is a diverse and open democratic society with good social order and living facilities. If you live in Taipei, you can easily reach the mountains or beaches within half an hour. Schools aimed at foreigners have excellent faculties, and tuition is relatively cheap. More importantly, there is the National Health Insurance program. There is also a friendly and enthusiastic attitude toward foreigners, and Taiwanese businesspeople’s experience and accomplishments in China.
With so many advantages, Taiwan is certainly qualified to become an Asia-Pacific regional operations center. The biggest reason for the withdrawal of foreign companies, in addition to the rise of China and, in the past, tense cross-strait relations and bans on direct links, is high tax rates. Complex taxes and levies and inefficient handling of paperwork for deductions and exemptions, it is difficult for Taiwan to compete with the tax systems of Hong Kong and Singapore.
Since cross-strait relations have improved, Taiwan should seize the chance to turn itself into a regional operations center. It should attract the world’s top 500 corporations to establish their Asia-Pacific centers right here, to draw capital and boost employment.
Therefore, the government plans to offer a preferential tax policy for the establishment of operational centers in the proposed industrial upgrading statute, which failed to be passed by the end of the recent legislative session.
Oftentimes, the outside world mistakenly believes that a preferential tax policy for the top 500 corporations may benefit conglomerates, while causing losses for the government. This is a serious misunderstanding. Since many of these companies have not even invested in Taiwan, what loss could they cause?
As for local enterprises, only five or six are included in the top 500, according to the strict standards of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Ministry of Finance, and they are mostly high-tech companies listed on the stock market.
Under the current tax policy, such high-tech companies enjoy tax deductions for research and development (R&D) or for training staff, so their average tax rate is actually between 10 and 13 percent. That percentage is already lower than the 15 percent proposed in the abovementioned statute. Besides, there will be no deduction for R&D or staff training under the proposed new law.
How could anyone accuse the government of benefiting conglomerates only?
Ting Shou-chung is a Chinese Nationalist Party legislator.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
RSS