While Adimmune Corp’s production of vaccines is the concern of the company and the Food and Drug Administration, vaccination policy is jointly managed by the Department of Health (DOH) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). The government departments that oversee production and use of vaccines are on an equal footing, neither being subordinate to the other, and the relationship between the vaccine maker and the government being one of buyer and seller.
Former health ministers have voiced their support for the government’s swine flu vaccination program — Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) by volunteering for a flu jab and Twu Shiing-jer (涂醒哲) by saying that he hoped everyone would get vaccinated. The vaccines are supplied by two companies — Adimmune and Novartis — and they do not have the right to be partial to one or the other.
Adimmune chairman Steve Chan (詹啟賢), also a former health minister, has criticized Minister of Health Yaung Chih-liang (楊志良) for being unwilling to publish vaccine test data. This is a question of government and business taking a different approach.
When Novartis was having difficulty supplying enough vaccines to meet demand, the DOH and the CDC had no choice but to approach Adimmune as the only other possible supplier.
Now that both Novartis and Adimmune are able to supply adequate amounts of the vaccine, it is time to shore up public confidence by publishing clinical test data on the two companies’ vaccines. Novartis’ A(H1N1) vaccine test report can be found in the Sept. 11, 2009 and Dec. 31, 2009 issues of the New England Journal of Medicine.
Any adverse reactions following administration of the vaccine should be announced in a timely manner, and statistics should be compiled of mild and severe reactions.
The occurrence of severe reactions should be weighed against the death rate for A(H1N1) in the whole population (six in 100,000). If the disadvantages of immunization outweigh the advantages by a statistically significant margin, then the newly established Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should intervene and investigate. If the FDA finds this task to be beyond its limited capabilities, then it should invite experts from overseas drug administrations to help out.
In 1976, when the US instituted a program for the whole population to be vaccinated against swine flu, there were 743 cases of severe adverse reactions, including 67 deaths. The vaccination program started on Oct. 1 of that year. As severe reactions were reported one after another, and given the fact that the human mortality rate from swine flu was not as high as expected, the program was terminated on Dec. 16. A New York Times opinion piece described the affair as a “sorry debacle.”
Although science and technology are more advanced today than they were then, Adimmune should take what happened 34 years ago as a warning. The company must face the risk of allergic and autoimmune reactions such as death, semiplegia, rheumatoid arthritis and acute facial palsy and publish data about severe reactions so they can be compared with equivalent figures from the US and figures for severe reactions to the Novartis vaccine in Taiwan.
Since 1998, when I was involved in the CDC’s establishment and promotion of the flu vaccination program for people aged 65 and over, I have watched the CDC gradually mature in its efforts to prevent enterovirus and influenza.
This is borne out by public support for the CDC, which has consistently been over 80 percent throughout the past decade.
In the first month of the A(H1N1) vaccination program, which started in November, cancellations of classes and work because of swine flu outbreaks plunged 95 percent, and the number of deaths has not risen from 35. These figures indicate that the immunization policy is a wise one.
In the US, following the failure of the 1976 swine flu immunization program, the vaccine industry reviewed its work under the strengthened supervision of the US CDC, allowing it to emerge from the crisis and start anew.
The same should be done in the case of Adimmune and other vaccine makers in Taiwan. Furthermore, capital owned by political parties should not be invested in the vaccine industry; otherwise it will create a situation where those parties can control national health policy through the DOH.
The spat between Chan and Yaung should serve as a warning.
Mayo Kuo is a pediatrician.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS