Talent, not English
Professor Daisy Hung’s (洪蘭) comments about the learning practices of National Taiwan University students struck a serious debate about the problems that higher education in Taiwan is facing. Following that, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said universities should offer more courses in English to retain talents and attract foreign students.
Responding to your timely and thought-provoking article “An education in internationalization” (Nov. 9, page 8), I agree with Ma that Taiwan’s system of higher education must become more connected with the world. However, offering university courses in English is not the best way to attract students.
First, English is not a native or official language in Taiwan. It is unlikely that all professors are capable of giving courses in English. Although some obtained their doctorial degrees in English-speaking countries, it is no guarantee that they are qualified to teach in English. With regard to theoretical courses, students have difficulty understanding abstract theories even in their native tongue. English would create more barriers and impede students from acquiring the fundamental knowledge they need.
Furthermore, we should not give up Chinese for English, because the whole world is learning Chinese.
English is the official language in Hong Kong and Singapore. It is therefore reasonable for them to use English in school. We should not use Singapore and Hong Kong as a reference, however, because we have different cultural backgrounds. In 2007, the US adopted an “Advanced Placement Chinese Language and Culture” program for its universities. As Taiwan is a bastion of traditional Chinese culture, we should take Chinese as our first choice instead of English.
Finally, universities should recruit outstanding Taiwanese academics from all over the world. Many celebrated academics who come from Taiwan are currently abroad or at universities in China and Hong Kong. If universities in Taiwan offered better recruitment packages, Taiwanese academics who are abroad would be more than happy to come back to Taiwan to teach here, or to conduct research. Professor Liu Chung-laung (劉炯朗), former president of National Tsing Hua University, is a perfect example. World-renowned academics, not English, would be the best incentive to attract students — both from Taiwan and abroad.
MANDY CHOU
Taipei
Ma’s poison pill
Following Saturday’s elections, I went to the post office to donate money to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
Finally, after more than one year of trouble, the DPP won in Yilan County, a spiritual stronghold of the party. Though the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) still controls a majority of mayor and commissioner positions, the winner in the local elections was the DPP. This shows that the political and economic views of the DPP are more precise and acceptable to the public. Compared with the poor performance of the Ma administration, the DPP has done well as an opposition party. Ma is losing ground while DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) is emerging as a strong leader. She passed the exam; Ma didn’t.
Who, therefore, is best suited to talk with China in the name of all Taiwanese? It is not Ma. It is Tsai. While Ma rushes to sign an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China, Tsai’s status and cool style will be appreciated by more people. An ECFA could be the poison that ends Ma’s political career.
NI KUO-RONG
Hsinchu
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused