On Nov. 14, thousands of Taiwanese took to the streets of Taipei to express their growing concern at the present administration's continued mismanagement of the nation’s international affairs. In line with this, the legislature has been deadlocked on an amendment to the Act Governing Food Sanitation (食品衛生法). At issue, of course, was the recent agreement by President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government to ease restrictions on US beef imports.
Don’t misunderstand this. It is not that Taiwanese do not like US prime rib, T-bones or filet mignon; they love them. What Taiwanese are upset about is the slipshod manner of negotiations and apparent deal-making that the Ma government is trying to present as a fait accompli.
What was the agreement and what was the presumed deal? Back on Nov. 2, the agreement was this: Ma’s government, with little advance warning, lifted its ban on US bone-in beef and other beef products, including offal and ground beef. These items present a clear and present danger for the people of Taiwan and yet that’s where the Ma government has been cavalier in its attitude toward public safety.
Ma blatantly has tried to dodge the issue by in effect professing, “I am letting in poisoned products, but don’t be alarmed I am not forcing you to buy and eat them.” Then why let them in to begin with?
Here then is the second part. What is the presumed deal? Why, with so little discussion or consultation of the legislature and the public, was this made and announced as a done deal? What was to be gained by letting in such potential dangers? Where is the pay-off that Ma wanted and needed?
Ma has asked legislators not to reject this deal or amend the law because it would risk the nation’s credibility. The issue, however, is not the nation’s credibility, but the credibility of the Ma government in making ill-advised deals with little thought for public health.
In effect, Ma is asking the people to save his face by saying, “My people goofed up and were caught. But please don’t embarrass us in front of the world and the US by asking us to go back to the bargaining table. We will look bad.”
Look bad? Of course they will. Ma’s people looking bad has been the story of this government since it took office. Incompetence and an autocratic attitude of trying to squelch any questioning of its performance has been the order of the day.
The issues, problems and opposition are bigger than US beef. Further dangers loom. The Ma’s government has already signed a financial memorandum of understanding with China, again with little serious discussion. Now, worse still, a blind, non-transparent, economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China is coming up, a deal that could damage Taiwan’s industries and agricultural sector and weaken the nation’s sovereignty.
Who will be making the profit on these deals as well? The people of Taiwan have good reason to be worried.
Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taipei.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS