Yesterday WAS the 10th anniversary of the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women. The Garden of Hope Foundation in Taiwan and the Taiwan Anti-Sexual Exploitation Alliance, together with local and international allies, express our deep concern regarding the Cabinet’s recent proposal to legalize prostitution, a form of violence against women. Five international and national women’s organizations from Canada, South Korea, the UK and the US spoke in support of Taiwanese women’s opposition to legalization of prostitution at a press conference in Taipei yesterday.
The Council of Grand Justices recently ruled that Article 80 of the Social Order Maintenance Act (社會秩序維護法), which penalizes prostitutes but not their customers, goes against the principle of equality and should be changed within two years. Although we welcome the ruling against punishing prostitutes, we do not support the government’s move to legalize the sex industry and establish a red light district — both of which are a violation of women’s rights. We believe that the Taiwanese government has made a critical error by failing to recognize the highly unequal relationship that exists between men and women in the sex trade.
We strongly urge the government not to legalize prostitution because it is a form of violence against women. Designating red light districts would amount to legalizing the violation of women’s rights. Legalization will only allow men to continue to treat women as commodities, with the government becoming dependent on revenue generated by this practice. Taiwan will become known internationally as a country that supplies women to other countries that have sex industries or a sex tourism destination. Many countries that have experimented with the sex industry now realize that it was a total failure: The sex industry does not decrease sexual violence against women, but turns a country into a destination for international sex tourism and trafficked women.
The majority of women who enter the sex trade do so because of poverty. We strongly urge the government to recognize the state’s responsibility to address the exploitation of poor women and girls in prostitution and to enact progressive social, economic and political policies that benefit poor women and advance equality of the genders. This brave step is recognized by many countries around the globe, including Sweden, Norway and Iceland.
Taiwan is at a critical point in promoting the rights of women and girls. We urge the government not to legalize prostitution under any circumstances and to take the following actions to protect women against sexual exploitation:
1. Do not legalize the sex trade; prostitution is a form of violence against women, not a job. Doing so would only denigrate the value of women in the labor force as they become sex objects.
2. Stop penalizing female prostitutes, many of whom often enter the sex trade because of poverty.
3. Initiate social, economic and political policies that benefit poor women and advance gender equality. Prostitution should not be the only choice for women in poverty.
4. Customers and third parties who profit from the sex trade should face legal penalties. The government should strictly prohibit any information and acts related to recruiting women into prostitution.
Garden of Hope Foundation, Taiwan
Taiwan Anti-Sexual
Exploitation Alliance, Taiwan
Taipei Women’s Rescue Foundation, Taiwan
ECPAT-Taiwan, Taiwan
Taiwan Women’s Link, Taiwan
Asian Women Coalition Ending Prostitution, Canada
Coalition against Trafficking in Women, USA
Equality Now, UK
Pyeong-Taek Sexual Violence Relief Center, South Korea
Sexual Assault Support Center of Ottawa, Canada
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS