This is the season for Asian gatherings. The ASEAN summit in Thailand late last month brought all the key players of Asia together. Later this month, almost all of them will meet again in Singapore at the APEC summit, which will include other Pacific leaders, plus US President Barack Obama.
Summits are a circus with many rings and acronyms. At the ASEAN summit, the 10 Southeast Asian leaders met counterparts from China, Japan and South Korea. These 13 countries then met again with India, Australia and New Zealand.
Some 42 agreements were reportedly penned at the meeting, on issues ranging from outstanding trade and economic matters to the launch of a human rights commission. Not bad for a summit that some feared would not happen at all: An earlier meeting planned for April in Bangkok was disrupted by protesters — “red shirts” who support ousted Thai prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra.
As for Obama, he will first visit Japan, and, while at APEC, will attend the first US-ASEAN Summit. Afterwards, he will go to China and South Korea. What additional dimension might the US president bring on his first visit to the region?
Obama is still fighting back home for his healthcare initiative and is hamstrung from acting on climate change in time for the Copenhagen summit, which is to agree on a successor treaty to the Kyoto Protocol. So there is a risk that he will come to Asia for just a star turn and photo opportunities while reserving his strength for other battles. But more is needed and should be expected of him.
Starting with Japan, Obama needs to ensure a good working relationship with Yukio Hatoyama, the new prime minister. Japan has voiced support for an East Asian community that includes India, Australia and New Zealand, while the Chinese and others question widening the circle. The US should welcome the Japanese initiative and engage with Asia as a whole. Keeping Japan close is a starting point.
Moving onto ASEAN, much attention will be on how Obama interacts with Myanmar’s leader, who will also be present. Obama should stand for democracy and help push for a clean vote in the elections that the junta has promised for next year.
But there are other, broader opportunities. ASEAN has been the hub for Asian regionalism, but some in Australia have proposed focusing only on the larger countries. Southeast Asians have a renewed openness toward US leadership, and meaningful initiatives can be started that would resonate with regional aspirations.
One such initiative is for freer trade. While the US has stood on the sidelines, intra-Asian agreements have run ahead. US Senator Richard Lugar has floated the idea of a free-trade agreement between the US and ASEAN. But, with Myanmar included, this may be too difficult politically and an ASEAN sub-grouping may be more realistic.
Another option is for the US to press for a Trans-Pacific Partnership. This was proposed late in the administration of US president George W. Bush to forge links with some ASEAN members — Singapore, Vietnam and Brunei — as well as others across the Pacific. This could be built up to include other open Southeast Asian economies — Malaysia and Thailand — with the eventual aim being an APEC-wide agreement, which would be an impressive achievement if realized by the end of 2011, when it will be Obama’s turn to play host to all the leaders.
In this time of crisis and unemployment, the US public may question freer trade. But more and more US businesses realize that still-growing Asian markets are vital for their future profits and overall economic recovery.
Most economic frameworks are among Asians only, but a US initiative could trump them and ensure that the region remains open and engaged with the US. It could also help lessen the tendency of some governments to gravitate ever closer towards the booming Chinese economy.
Of course, when Obama arrives in Beijing, he must continue to strengthen cooperation with China. On the economic crisis, climate change and many other global issues, China and the US are potentially the decisive actors. But the US must also engage in a more multilateral way to include Southeast Asia’s smaller countries. China has been charming them over the past decade, and the US must offer an attractive alternative.
To cynics, APEC is a talking shop, while ASEAN is an arena for an ongoing contest between China and Japan, with India on the side. But, despite the rivalries and all the chatter, it is clear that Asians are coming closer together. And, while Asian regionalism is messy and rife with tensions and flash points, the US has been the stabilizing power in the region.
Obama has the opportunity to ensure that the region continues to see the US as the essential actor — now more open and helpful than before. If he achieves this, Obama’s long trip will be valuable for Americans, and Asians will realize that it was worth waiting for him.
Simon Tay is chairman of the Singapore Institute of International Affairs and a fellow at the Asia Society.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS