In addition to destroying many people’s homes, Typhoon Morakot washed out many wooded hillsides. At a rough estimate, floods caused by the typhoon left about 1 million tonnes of driftwood strewn along river banks or swept onto farmers’ fields.
The Council of Agriculture (COA) said the driftwood was waste material with no value and that it wanted local governments to pile it up or bury it on the spot to make way for tree planting. This is a rather unimaginative way of handling the problem.
Burning wood produces about half the heat generated by burning the same weight of coal. If there is 1 million tonnes of wood lying around — even excluding parts that cannot be cut up or are hard to burn because they contain too much mud and stones from landslides — it should still be possible to transport most of it to incinerators and burn it to generate electricity.
If the Taiwan Power Co pays US$100 for each tonne of coal it buys, then the waste driftwood left by Morakot should be able to provide Kaohsiung, Tainan, Pingtung and Taitung counties with roughly NT$1 billion (US$30.8 million) to NT$1.5 billion in revenue from power generation.
If local government estimates are correct — they say there are nearer to 5 million tonnes of driftwood — then income generated from selling the waste wood could be in the range of NT$5 billion to NT$7.5 billion.
It would be more cost effective to deliver the wood through the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) to incinerators to generate power instead of burying it as waste. Doing so would comply with Article 26 of the Post-Typhoon Morakot Reconstruction Special Act (莫拉克颱風災後重建特別條例) and with Article 8 of the Waste Disposal Act (廢棄物清理法), and would provide extra revenue for local governments.
On the other hand, if the wood is left to decompose, it may be washed out again by storms even if it is buried, which puts us back at square one and is a complete waste of public funds.
The Pingtung County Government estimates there are 500,000 tonnes of driftwood in Pingtung alone, some of it piled up to 2m. If all this wood were to be piled together, it would take up at least 100 hectares of land.
Considering the government’s financial predicament, it should think harder about how to increase revenue and cut expenditures. Burying driftwood on the spot would be a gift to those who want to collect it for their own profit, and would be economically inefficient. The Cabinet has allocated NT$190 million to the COA for clearing up the driftwood, which does not include funds provided to the Water Resources Agency.
The only solution the COA can come up with, however, is to tell local governments to pile up the driftwood or bury it.
Because of government inefficiency, the fact that plans for handling the driftwood are poorly defined and do not clearly lay out rights and responsibilities, and because manpower and equipment are not evenly distributed, people in some areas are tired of waiting for the driftwood to be cleared and have started burning it themselves, causing air pollution.
If the same budget were instead given to the EPA to burn the wood in incinerators, it would have the following advantages. First, it would generate extra revenue from electricity generation. Second, it would take advantage of the EPA’s professional experience in waste disposal to avoid causing pollution during the clean-up process. Third, the wood would be given to incinerators that have been short of trash to burn because of improved recycling, including those at Ganshan and Renwu in Kaohsiung County, Yongkang in Tainan County, Kanding in Pingtung County and those in Taitung County, to burn and keep their generators running. Fourth, it would benefit the residents of flood-stricken areas by allowing farmers to start cultivating their fields.
From this point of view, the driftwood problem is not just a crisis, but an opportunity. If handled in the right way, the wood can be cleared away quickly, cutting pollution, and can be used to generate electricity, earning money for local governments and benefiting flood-stricken areas. It really is a case of killing many birds with one stone.
The COA always sees driftwood as government property in the first instance, which is in line with Article 15 of the Forestry Act (森林法). However, driftwood that cannot be sold as timber should not be thought of as worthless.
If the COA and EPA work together, they can turn dirt into gold.
What they must avoid is a situation where, because the policies, powers and responsibilities of the two agencies are not clearly defined, gold is instead turned into dirt and taxpayers’ hard-earned money goes to waste.
Winston Dang is a former Environmental Protection Administration minister.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past