Department of Health (DOH) Minister Yaung Chih-liang (楊志良) said recently that we cannot directly link death after treatment with the vaccine for A(H1N1) influenza to the vaccine itself and that further studies are needed.
Since this involves the risks posed by vaccinations, the ministry should explain the risks to the public and take proper precautions.
Earlier last month, a New York Times editorial said the US government took a series of steps to prepare for a potential A(H1N1) pandemic. Public officials were instructed to stockpile antiviral drugs. When a swine flu case emerged in April, diagnostic kits to detect the virus were created for use nationwide and domestic companies were enrolled to make the vaccine.
In addition, the government signed contracts with several farmers in Pennsylvania and requisitioned their eggs to grow flu vaccine.
By the middle of next month, the US will have at least 80 million doses ready for a mass immunization program. It seems everything has proceeded smoothly and is under control.
However, the weakest link in this chain of preparations is the federal bureaucracy’s head-in-the-sand attitude toward explaining the risks of the vaccination program to the public, which may cause all those efforts to come to naught.
In Taiwan, this is reflected in the DOH’s torpor in informing the public of any risks posed by flu vaccine, despite repeated assurances that domestically produced flu vaccines are safe and effective.
Some risks posed by treatment with the flu vaccine are predictable.
The real controversy, however, will not appear until after the health authorities begin administering flu vaccinations on a large scale this fall and winter.
The DOH will issue 10 million doses of the vaccine, three times the number of people receiving seasonal influenza vaccines in previous years.
That being the case, the probabilities of side effects caused by the vaccine will increase significantly.
In 1976, one in 100,000 people in the US who received the H1N1 flu vaccine suffered from side effects, developing Guillain-Barre syndrome — a crippling nerve disorder that caused many deaths. Some academics argue that it might have been related to the antigen in vaccines or toxins in contaminated germs during the manufacturing process.
Will similar reactions be seen in Taiwan following the implementation of a mass vaccination program?
Statistically speaking, it is inevitable that some of the nearly 1 million people receiving vaccines this fall will become ill or die.
If anyone happens to get ill or die after being vaccinated, it will likely be the result of underlying health problems, although the vaccine will often be blamed.
For example, pregnant women infected with swine flu are four times more likely to become severely ill or die than ordinary people.
But statistics show that about one in seven pregnancies ends in a miscarriage. Thus, after pregnant women get the vaccine, a miscarriage may coincidentally happen. Some will likely attribute it to the vaccine.
Now that the DOH has given pregnant women priority for the future flu vaccine program, a major controversy could ensue.
If this were to happen, it would certainly turn into a political storm.
Public health officials should be prepared.
Liou Pei-pai is a former director of the Taiwan Animal Health Research Institute.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS