The controversy over the proposed economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China may have distracted attention from the resumption of negotiations between Washington and Taipei on a free trade deal.
Republican Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, a ranking member of the Foreign Affairs Committee, last week urged US Trade Representative Ron Kirk to promptly resume negotiations with Taiwan for a Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA) and for a US-Taiwan bilateral investment agreement.
A TIFA would provide strategic frameworks and principles for dialogue on trade and investment issues between the US and its trading partners. It could lead to further trade liberalization, such as a free trade agreement (FTA).
The US negotiated with Taiwan on a TIFA in 2007 and last year without success because of Taiwan’s refusal to lift restrictions on beef imports from the US. So, for those who care about Taiwan, Congresswoman Ros-Lehtinen deserves our appreciation for telling Kirk that TIFA negotiations with Taiwan should be resumed as soon as possible.
Taiwan has been a de facto player in East Asian integration through trade with and investment in ASEAN countries and China. However, because of the China factor, Taiwan has not been able to join any of the proposed trading blocs, whether it be ASEAN plus one or ASEAN plus any other number.
Given the severe challenges that result from being marginalized, Taiwan should grasp every opportunity to work with the US, which is also a player in East Asian integration, to break through the wall of marginalization.
What this means is that Taiwan should not just focus on an ECFA with China. In fact, implementing an ECFA without signing FTAs bilaterally and multilaterally elsewhere in the region would lead Taiwan to fall into the trap of the “hub-spoke” scenario described by Nobel laureate Paul Krugman, under which China would become the hub (or core) and Taiwan would become a spoke (or peripheral).
Resumption of TIFA negotiations with the US would be one step in the right direction in discussing a wide range of issues relating to trade and investment. Taiwan should not hesitate in responding if Washington suggests an immediate restart of talks.
A TIFA with the US would be conducive to furthering an FTA now that the US’ economic recovery is well under way and given that the administration of US President Barack Obama is paying due attention to the proliferation of trading blocs in Asia, and not just North Korean nuclear proliferation.
Taiwan needs to adopt a cosmopolitan view to understand that globalization is not the same as Sinicization. Taipei needs to sign individual FTAs with all of its trading partners, notably with the US, and not just an ECFA with China.
An ECFA with China will not serve as a panacea and may even result in the Taiwanese economy becoming peripheral to the Chinese hub.
Peter C.Y. Chow is professor of economics at the City University of New York and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS