The Eighth World Games get under way in Kaohsiung with tonight’s opening ceremony.
The Games will see more than 4,000 athletes from around 100 countries and regions descend on the city to take part in 31 events over the course of the 10-day sporting extravaganza — the biggest sporting event the nation has ever hosted.
Although the World Games do not share the high profile of their Olympic counterpart, they present Kaohsiung and Taiwan with a great opportunity to attract positive coverage in the global media.
For Kaohsiung, the World Games also offer a rare opportunity for the nation’s second city to steal some of the limelight usually reserved for the capital. Hosting thousands of foreign guests from all around the world will hand the residents of Kaohsiung the chance to broaden their horizons and make connections with more people from outside the Asia-Pacific region.
For Taiwan, the occasion presents the nation with a platform on which to step out of the shadow of its giant neighbor and demonstrate to the world what a friendly, tolerant, free and thriving society this is.
Of course, this can only happen if both sides of the political divide can work together to show the true Taiwan to visitors and television audiences around the world.
Too often in the past politicians have let partisan interests and ideological differences get in the way of hosting international events, ruining countless opportunities for Taiwan to show the world what it is capable of.
With a bit of luck, Kaohsiung promises to be different.
So far, apart from a few squabbles over the budget, the signs have been encouraging, especially following President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) announcement this week that he will attend the opening ceremony as president of the nation.
But even if domestic differences are kept under control, the behavior of that other perennial fly in the ointment — China — is less predictable.
Ma’s announcement, coupled with the Kaohsiung Organizing Committee’s decision not to ban spectators from carrying the Republic of China flag (a move that flouts Olympic protocol) will no doubt have caught Beijing’s attention.
It remains to be seen how the Chinese will react, but they have to realize that, unlike on other occasions when Chinese officials have protested or snatched flags out of the hands of Taiwanese competitors, this time they will be in Taiwan.
It may prove to be tough for Chinese athletes and team officials to keep their cool, especially if there are any incidents of flag baiting by Taiwanese, but any displays of hostile Chinese nationalism will only increase the negative opinion of China that many Taiwanese hold.
Let’s hope that Chinese officials understand this and have briefed their delegation and asked its members to exercise restraint.
The saying “politics and sports shouldn’t mix” may not ring entirely true for Taiwan, but it should be taken to heart over the next 10 days.
Only by adopting this attitude can the Kaohsiung World Games reach their potential.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international