The global financial storm has had a severe impact on trade and the domestic market in Taiwan, which has suffered the worst unemployment figures and economic contraction of the Four Asian Tigers.
Figures show that excessive reliance on China is the major cause of Taiwan’s recession. Since the global financial crisis broke last year, China has suffered a grave decline in exports. But Taiwanese exports to China have suffered even more.
The signing of an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China may be beneficial to some Taiwanese industries, but it will not be beneficial to Taiwan’s economy as a whole.
Moreover, it is not realistic for Taiwan’s lackluster economy to rely on an economic pact with China and Chinese demand.
The logic of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration runs like this: As long as cross-strait policy liberalizes, then the nation’s economy is certain to grow and unemployment will fall to below 3 percent.
SPECIOUS
This is a specious assertion. In Taiwan, which has higher labor costs, it is far-fetched to claim that deregulation of economic trade across the Strait and an economic agreement with China will reduce unemployment.
Any form of economic integration has an impact on a country’s autonomy.
To date, the UK, Denmark and Sweden are still not willing to join the EU monetary union. However, the reality is that despite the enormous size of the eurozone as an economic entity, London has not been marginalized. Indeed, it remains the financial capital of the world.
This tells us that having an enormous economy as a neighbor does not necessarily make dependence the best policy.
If dependence leads to a nation losing its economic autonomy, then economic security and even national security will be under considerable threat. We should carefully consider this from the perspectives of local demand and long-term interest when reflecting on strategies for Taiwan’s economic autonomy.
If the government sincerely wanted to prevent Taiwan from being economically marginalized, it would not be promoting reliance on the Chinese market because China still has a low GDP.
Instead, the government should exclude China from industrial policy.
TECHNOLOGIES
Other countries that have attained the goal of an annual average per capita income of US$30,000 have not done so by being dependent on the Chinese market but by relying on technologies that they control and on industries and products with high added value.
Taiwan should adopt a new industrial mindset and abandon the East Asian manufacturing and export mode that emphasizes cost-cutting.
In addition, the government should gradually transfer the focus of national economic development from OEM industries that have long relied on inexpensive labor to export industries that make products with high added value and to domestic industries that improve living standards.
The government is sorely mistaken if it thinks that relying on the Chinese market will bring about its stated goals of annual GDP growth of 6 percent, annual per capita income of US$30,000 and an unemployment rate of less than 3 percent.
Chiou Jiunn-rong is a professor of economics and vice dean of the Management School at National Central University.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is often accused of getting close to, and even conspiring with, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). There are certainly good reasons behind these accusations, yet the confounding truth is that it makes neither historical nor logical sense for it to do so. Whether one believes that the Chinese civil war fought between the KMT and CCP in the previous century has ended or has yet to be resolved, the KMT’s retreat to Taiwan in 1949 resulted in the CCP governing China and the KMT taking root in Taiwan. For years, the KMT refused to even
RSS