Most US academics, experts and government officials hope that the government’s China policy will bring stable development to the Taiwan Strait. There is, however, another view. Well-known neo-conservatives and Taiwan experts Robert Sutter and Shelley Rigger, who were Senator John McCain’s national security strategists during the presidential election, have expressed some unease, a reflection of the difficulties Taiwan will experience in striking a balance between the US and China.
The cross-strait relationship is experiencing its most rapid and dramatic improvement in 60 years. Cross-strait political, economic, military and psychological imbalances are increasing. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) may try to restrict or block these changes, but it will be hard put to change the overall situation. Beijing is using the platforms for communication between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), cross-strait talks and cross-strait forums to widen its contacts with Taiwan. In Taiwan, however, China policy is developing along two increasingly divergent political viewpoints.
Taiwan required Beijing’s nod of approval to be invited to the World Health Assembly. The CCP has showed goodwill toward the KMT following the KMT’s acceptance of the “1992 consensus,” the moniker “Chinese Taipei” and dealing with issues on a case by case basis, but there are no guarantees it will extend the same treatment to a DPP-led government. With Beijing’s and Taipei’s opaque handling of key decisions, the rationale is that the results count, not the means.
Growing political, economic, military and psychological imbalances in cross-strait relations are causing a series of challenges to US policymaking. The general view in the US is that the Taiwanese government is relaxing political tension with China, but that the new policy is not risk-free. The question is whether the US government can respond to these unprecedented developments in cross-strait relations, or if it will have to single out a Chinese-Taiwanese economic cooperation framework agreement and passively say that it must not violate US interests in Taiwan.
In addition to relaxing the cross-strait economic and political relationship, Beijing must also eliminate any possibility of a US role in the establishment of a peace agreement and a cross-strait mutual trust mechanism on marine affairs. Rigger said one opinion in the US was that if Taiwan’s only concerns were economic and political exchanges with China and it reduced its military capabilities, the weapons systems the US has provided Taiwan over the years could pass to the People’s Liberation Army. Sutter and Rigger want the US to create a new policy, or at least to conduct a policy review and develop a response plan.
Former American Institute in Taiwan director Richard Bush says that China’s growing strength is making it increasingly complicated for the US and Taiwan to maintain their joint strategic view. What Bush does not say is that one result of China’s increasing strength and Beijing’s increasing ability to direct cross-strait relations is that US influence over the situation is diminishing.
The administration of former US president Bill Clinton could not get a good grasp of confidential cross-strait exchanges, just as the current US administration has problems getting a clear understanding of the ongoing cross-strait talks.
The US and Taiwan are ignoring the expanding cross-strait imbalance as they compete to improve relations with China and come up with ways to respond to new challenges to the relationship between Taiwan, the US and China.
Lin Cheng-yi is a research fellow at the Institute of European and American Studies at Academia Sinica.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
RSS