Upon taking office last May, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) set two priorities in foreign policy: improve relations with China, Taiwan’s main threat, and repair the damage to Taiwan’s standing with the US, its primary foreign protector.
For the last 10 months, Ma has sought to ease tensions with China with small moves such as arranging for more passenger flights from Taipei to China and inviting more Chinese tourists to visit Taiwan. In recent days, Ma has turned to concentrate on rebuilding trust from the US, especially from US President Barack Obama and his administration.
Ma addressed an influential audience in Washington through a videoconference call last Wednesday in which he promised “surprise-free and low-key” dealings with the US and an effort to be a “responsible peacemaker” in the international arena. He said “pragmatism” would be the mark of his foreign policy.
In contrast, Ma’s predecessor, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), antagonized Chinese leaders with his relentless pursuit of independence for Taiwan. Chen antagonized US leaders, including former US president George W. Bush, who was basically pro-Taiwan, by failing to consult with Washington and by taking what Bush officials considered to be reckless positions toward China.
Even as Ma spoke, the Chinese reminded the people of Taiwan, and indeed the world, that they were continuing to acquire the military power to deter Taiwanese independence and possibly to conquer the island. The People’s Liberation Army marked the 60th anniversary of its navy with a review at sea that included warships from 14 other navies, including the US.
The US Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Gary Roughead led the US delegation to Beijing and the port of Qingdao. The admiral, a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, conferred with political and military leaders as he sought to have Sino-US military exchanges revived. China broke them off in October after the US announced it would sell US$6.5 billion in arms to Taiwan.
Those exchanges are intended to dissuade Chinese leaders from miscalculating US capabilities and intentions. The US seeks to discern the reasons behind China’s military buildup, including its plans to acquire a blue-water navy as opposed to its present largely coastal navy.
The government of Taiwan has organized its current efforts to influence the US around the 30th anniversary of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which was enacted in Congress after former US president Jimmy Carter switched US diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing. The TRA governs US unofficial dealings with Taiwan, including arms sales.
To reinforce the TRA, Taiwan’s representatives in the US have sponsored a dozen panel discussions across the country in which scholars, specialists and diplomats have discussed the TRA and relations between the US and Taiwan. Journalists have been invited to Taiwan to interview leaders and to witness political and economic developments.
Ma’s address last Wednesday to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the prominent think tank in Washington, was a featured event in this effort. He emphasized Taiwan’s commitment to its own defense, which had been questioned by some in the US.
“I want to reassure America that Taiwan will not free-ride on the United States for its own security,” he said. “I urge the United States not to hesitate to provide Taiwan with the necessary defensive arms as stipulated in the Taiwan Relations Act.”
In addition, he said Taiwan would like to get a waiver on visas so that more Taiwanese tourists could visit the US, as well as negotiate a free trade agreement that would expand commerce.
Richard Halloran is a freelance writer based in Hawaii.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS