My loyal readers are probably expecting a stream of snarky remarks about Kuo Kuan-ying (郭冠英), the self-described “high-class Mainlander” who got his comeuppance this week.
Kuo is the now former Government Information Office (GIO) representative in Toronto who set off a poop storm with his bigoted comments about ethnic Taiwanese.
These included calling us taibazi (台巴子, rednecks) and wokou (倭寇, Jap pirates) and calling Taiwan a “devil island.”
After days of mounting outrage, the GIO finally got its act together and fired him.
I could join the “pile on the bigot” party. But as a “high-class satirist” I’m going to take the high road.
Besides, there’s not much I can add. Kuo’s “look at me” chauvinism and amateurish provocations are funny enough on their own.
And as for the idea that his “freedom of speech” has been violated, that’s an argument beneath contempt.
Any clown knows if you sign up to represent Taiwan (and get a fat salary doing so), you can’t go shooting off your mouth like you’re Johnny Neihu or something.
I normally hate to agree with a Peanut-party member, but Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強) had it right: As a government employee abroad, “if you don’t wash for three days, people will think Taiwan stinks.”
The phrase “high-class Mainlander” popped into my head this week while watching a cable TV news interview with a female Chinese tourist — one of the thousands who arrived courtesy of Amway — chomping betel nut for the first time.
Taking time out from some raucous Aboriginal song-and-dance-and-headdress activities with her frenzied colleagues, she talked with her mouth so agape that you could see her little Dragon tonsils wriggling around the mashed-up bits of betel nut. And her sunglasses were so tacky that even the most taike of Yunlin County five-and-dimes would throw them on the “rejects” pile.
Which brings me to another point: What’s with all the Amway (China) trips? I mean, does this US direct-selling giant have a devious plan to unify the two sides of the Strait to gain Asian market share from Herbalife?
And wasn’t Amway banned from doing direct sales in China just a few years ago?
Now, suddenly, they’re taking more cruises than The Love Boat.
A Wall Street Journal story from March 12, 2003, cleared things up. The group entered China in 1995, but quickly ran afoul of authorities over social unrest caused by get-rich-quick schemes that blossomed in the 1990s.
Amway was labeled, Falun Gong-like, as just another “evil cult.”
“That system [Amway’s direct-sales system] came into question in 1998, when Chinese officials cracked down on pyramid schemes and tarred direct-sales companies with the same brush. Though companies like Amway say their model is vastly different — their revenue comes from sales of real products, among other differences — officials saw no distinction. The State Council … banned all forms of such sales in a harshly worded notice that accused some companies of promoting “evil cults, secret societies, and superstitious and lawless activities.”
But then, “Amway went into proactive-communications mode, initiating meetings with central government officials to discuss its plight.”
Apparently they met with the right people — and took them to the right KTVs. Amway had to tweak its sales model a bit, but the Chicoms essentially gave the now guanxi-savvy company the green light to resume business, so that by 2003 it had “bounced back.”
I don’t know about you, but I’ve had a dim view of the organization ever since my Second Auntie Feng from Changhua joined up in the early 1990s.
Every time I had to attend a Neihu family gathering — which in those days was all too often — Auntie Feng would corner me with an hour-long conversion pitch, waxing lyrical about the merits of Amway shampoo and toilet paper and describing the bountiful riches that awaited me if I would just attend their next meeting in a rented conference hall in Banciao (板橋) and start peddling her stuff to my friends, co-workers and random strangers on the street.
When dear old Auntie keeled over from a heart attack some years later (bless her direct-sold soul), she left the family with crippling debt and a dinglou full of unsold Amway merchandise. We couldn’t give the stuff away.
Back to the future: Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) wants a berth on the next Amway boat to Taiwan. In fact, he’s all but said he’s willing to bend over and squeal like a pig — if that’s what it takes to come visit our dear “treasure island.”
Chicom-friendly rag the China Post had it from the horse’s mouth. According to the paper, Wen said: “‘Although I’m 67 years old, I would like to visit Taiwan if possible. I would like to go even if I can’t walk and I have to crawl.’”
Now, for a Chicom, Wen actually seems like a nice guy — in a kind of grandfatherly, “you’d never guess I’m an autocrat” kind of way.
Which is why I’d hate to see what would happen if he ventured into southern Taiwan.
Go too deep into Tainan County, and I’m afraid it would turn into something out of Deliverance — with Wen in the luckless Ned Beatty role and the shrieking sound of temple suona (嗩吶) instead of deep Georgia woods banjo-pickin’.
I mean, remember what happened to the last Chicom who made a pit stop in Tainan? He’s not gonna forget that old lady with the crutch anytime soon.
Got something to tell Johnny? Go on, get it off your chest. Write to dearjohnny@taipeitimes.com, but be sure to put “Dear Johnny” in the subject line or he’ll mark your bouquets and brickbats as spam.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with