When Chris Lintott, a researcher in the department of physics at the University of Oxford, first considered launching a Web site to ask the public to help classify photographs of 1 million galaxies, he assumed it would probably take three or four years to complete.
Galaxy Zoo, (galaxyzoo.org) launched in July 2007, was supposed to be a side project; instead it has turned into the biggest citizen-science experiment on the Web.
Galaxies can be classified as spiral, elliptical or merging (when two come together). The Sloan Digital Sky Survey, or SDSS (www.sdss.org), has images of nearly 1 million galaxies; what those images don’t have in their raw form is the information about what class of galaxy is pictured.
Lintott had hoped that each image would get 10 classifications, or “clicks,” and that the public would prove able to classify galaxies accurately according to their features. Three weeks and 10 million clicks later, he was proved right: the public is capable of classifying galaxies as well as, or even better than, professional astronomers.
And quickly, too.
“It was like being hit by a tidal wave,” Lintott said.
The images have now had more than 70 million clicks in total, allowing Lintott and his team to go beyond simply sorting galaxies into spiral, elliptical or merging categories.
“You can have confidence, as we can say, ‘100 percent of people think that’s a spiral galaxy, so it’s really, really spirally,’” Lintott said.
His team was allocated precious time on the IRAM 30m radio telescope in southern Spain, and was easily able to select just 40 galaxies from the original sample to study, safe in the knowledge that the scientists had exactly what they needed.
After Galaxy Zoo’s initial success, Lintott wanted to take a closer look at merging galaxies. At 5pm one Tuesday, he posted a spreadsheet listing a selection to the forums and asked members to take a look and e-mail him the best. Then he went to the pub.
One “Zooite,” Richard Proctor, a telecoms consultant, spotted the spreadsheet and thought: “I can build a Web page to do that!”
By the time Lintott logged back in, the Web interface was already in use.
“What was going to be a quick little study turned into a much larger study of about 45,000 images,” Proctor said.
Each image has now had more than 25 clicks, with four particularly committed souls having seen every single one. The first academic paper about those merging galaxies has been submitted, and Proctor is listed as a co-author.
It’s not the first time collaborative astronomy has proved a hit online. The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) project created the most powerful distributed computer ever with its SETI@home project launched in May 1999, which used spare processing power on home computers to process data collected from a specific wavelength to see if aliens were trying to get in touch.
It was used by 5.2 million people and offered, at its peak, 265 teraflops (1 trillion calculations a second) of processing power.
Similarly, NASA’s Clickworkers project in 2000 to 2001, found that ordinary people were just as good as astronomers at identifying craters on Mars in photos.
The biggest influence on Galaxy Zoo, however, was Stardust@home, where users search for tiny interstellar dust particles within images returned by the 2006 Stardust mission. Thousands of users have logged on to the site.
“Stardust@home was a real inspiration for us,” Lintott said. “We thought, ‘If 20,000 people will look for dust grains in their spare time, surely they will look at beautiful pictures of galaxies?’”
But unlike those projects, where the task was set from the top down, the Galaxy Zoo community has its own ideas about what can be done with the SDSS data.
“Up until now,” Proctor said, “the professional astronomers have come up with things that want classifying and we’ve classified them.”
But there are thousands of irregular galaxies — neither spiral nor elliptical — that the professionals don’t have time to examine. So the community decided to do it themselves, drafting a list of questions and building a Web interface to make classification easier.
“Once we’ve got some results,” Proctor said, “we’ll publish them for everybody to use and then see if we can find out anything useful. Given that the biggest study of irregular galaxies to date looked at around 150, and we’ve got 9,000, we must find something!”
Lintott is supportive of the irregulars project: “They are doing everything professional astronomers would do. It’s up there with any work I’ve done.”
It’s not just the volume of research that can be done by collaborating with the public that’s important to Lintott, but also the opening up of scientific research to anyone with a browser and a little time.
“By making the data available to everyone,” he said, “whatever stage you are in your learning, you can do research.”
And a surprising number of people are doing just that. Hanny van Arkel is a Dutch primary school teacher who discovered a strange object, now called Hanny’s Voorwerp (Dutch for “object”), near a spiral galaxy.
“I thought it was fun,” she said of Galaxy Zoo. “But I didn’t expect that it would become such a big part of my life. I’ve learned a lot and it’s a good way of participating in science.”
Elisabeth Baeten, a Belgian secretary, is one of only four people who has seen every image in the galaxy merger project.
“I also classify the irregulars,” she said, “and in between I cruise the universe looking for asteroids and gravitational lenses.”
In future, it will be much easier for both scientists and enthusiasts to take part in such projects. Not only are Lintott and his colleagues finalizing Galaxy Zoo 2, which will examine galaxies in much more detail, they are also building a platform that will allow any scientist to upload data and tap into the vast potential of the Internet.
“Our users are clamoring for stuff to do,” Lintott said. “The problem of having too much data to pay close attention to is not just an astronomical problem. It’s astronomical in scale, but it’s not just us.”
The new project will allow scientists to upload their videos and pictures of galaxies or chemical structures, then specify what they want done with them. They can either use the provided templates, or customize their project. Lintott describes it as the scientific version of the popular blogging software WordPress.
And there are many uses of such a platform. NASA has high-quality images from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, most of which are simply filed. And study of the pictures produced by this year’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter will allow scientists to build a history of asteroid bombardment of the inner solar system.
“It’s like NASA does the map and we’ll write the guide book,” Lintott said.
Indeed, it would be possible for anyone to upload data, including amateur astronomers.
“More than a million separate observations a year are recorded by amateurs,” Lintott said. “That’s a huge pile of data that, at the minute, professionals slowly sort through, but we can hand that back to the amateurs to analyze. We may just be putting ourselves out of a job.”
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS