This winter is not as cold as those of years past, but an unusual chill is making people more and more uneasy. On Dec. 27, many of my friends joined us in a forum sponsored by Taiwan Thinktank. These are people who would rather discuss the nation’s future rather than simply enjoy the gentle wind and beautiful sunshine outside.
Public concern over a government decision-making process that is neither transparent nor democratic is growing as numerous policies are made behind closed doors. With a lack of oversight, mistakes are more often as are decisions that are damaging to the interests of the public. Confronted by strong social criticism of its policies, the government has only acted willfully and even tried to cover up its mistakes through lies and sophistry, leaving many people even angrier and worried.
In contrast, under the former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration, all major cross-strait policies were made only after a consensus was reached through discussions between the ruling and opposition camps, and with the participation of all sectors of society. For example, the government sponsored the 2001 Economic Development Advisory Conference and used the guidelines reached at the conference to formulate its “active opening, effective management” policy to govern cross-strait affairs. Another forum, the 2006 Conference on Sustainable Economic Development, was held before the administration changed the policy to “active management, effective opening.”
Such a democratic policy review mechanism is absent from the policymaking process of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government, which excludes civil society’s participation and treats the Legislative Yuan as a rubber stamp for policy endorsement.
Policies drawn behind closed doors are full of loopholes and harm the majority while profiting a minority. For example, the government has only stressed the advantages of relaxing restrictions on investments in China for Taiwanese companies — without mentioning the risks. A few people or companies may profit from these so-called “China-concept” shares, while many more retail investors are exposed to enormous risks.
About 74 percent of the companies listed on the Taiwanese stock market have subsidiaries in China. Although the law demands that a parent company and its subsidiaries consolidate their financial statements, the Taiwan Stock Exchange has no control over these companies’ operations in China. Taiwanese accountants have to give way to Chinese accountants in auditing the Chinese subsidiary firms. The government has failed to mention risks such as this.
As Taiwan Thinktank chairman Chen Po-chih (陳博志) said during the recent conference, the government had purposely exaggerated the benefits of its cross-strait economic and trade policy, while deceiving the public by ignoring its considerable hidden costs. Only a charlatan would claim that his medicine is a cure-all without any side effects. As the government repeatedly pretends that reliance on China is the solution to all of Taiwan’s economic problems, is it not behaving like a charlatan? This is more than incompetence — it is deceit.
Civil society is the source of strength for national progress. As a platform for informed discourse, Taiwan Thinktank will continue to host forums to engage the public on vital issues and to reveal the truth behind the government’s carefully wrapped propaganda and to stimulate independent thinking. It will raise its voice in the hope that its concerns will not fall on deaf ears.
Wu Rong-i is a board member of Taiwan Thinktank and a former vice premier.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS