On Oct. 12, the Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) and more than 100 parents staged a protest in Taichung against the John Tung Foundation.
This followed a move by the foundation to urge the Ministry of Education (MOE) to conduct screening for depression in university students.
This not only caused many people to suspect the foundation of cutting deals with the medical industry, but was also a breach of privacy that led to a large number of university students being labeled with the term “depression.”
For many years, the definition, testing, assessment and treatment of depression have lacked thought into the sociological factors behind depression.
To some degree, “depression” is a false label. French philosopher Michel Foucault said depression is a type of “discursive formation,” a “statement” and a product of the interaction of the “will to knowledge” and the “will to power.”
The message sent via the discourse created by “depression” is not subjective, neutral or natural.
On the contrary, it is filled with the medical community’s will to knowledge and power and it of course also involves huge medical interests.
As the medical profession gradually started gaining more knowledge and technical power during the 20th century, medical science started to replace traditional religion and law as a tool for controlling society.
Because professional privilege is self-organizing and self-sustaining, the practical scope of clinical medicine kept growing with the growth of pathological knowledge.
The number of definitions of illnesses that treated the body as composed of biomechanisms kept growing. The medical community started to come up with an increasing number of symptoms, diagnoses and treatments of problems from structural impediments to various forms of dysfunction.
Eventually this resulted in the formation of a society where the individual is constantly controlled by medical discourse.
Medicine’s traditional focus on biological disorders saw clinical medicine become increasingly concerned with biological treatment and made it more correct for doctors to focus on biological problems. Eventually, the medical community could call any syndrome that resulted in social dysfunction an illness.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder, hysteria, anxiety and depression are all examples of “illnesses” that have gradually been “identified” and documented by the medical profession. These developments resulted in the “medicalization” of our society.
Under such a social system, patients have a social responsibility to get better by receiving treatment from medical professionals and medical care and treatment have now become necessary for the normal functioning of our social mechanisms.
The WHO recently issued a report stating that depression will become one of the three main diseases of the 21st century along with AIDS and cancer.
The Bureau of Health Promotion of the Department of Health once conducted a survey into depression in Taiwan and found that 20 percent of women and 10 percent of men will suffer from depression at some point in their lives.
It was estimated that Taiwan has almost 1 million people who suffer from depression.
In order to lower the occurrence of suicide linked to depression in schools, at the end of 2006, the ministry promoted an anti-depression initiative, asking schools to monitor, select and create files on all new students and then conduct follow up investigations each semester on those thought to have a high propensity to depression and giving them treatment when necessary.
Schools started to monitor the activities of students who were not in a good mood, who did not want to eat, who felt stressed, uncomfortable, disinterested in the things around them and those who lacked self-confidence.
In effect, our campuses were turned into Panopticons, a type of prison conceived by 18th century English philosopher Jeremy Bentham.
In medical theory, depression and suicide are often linked. However, right from the start of his philosophical essay The Myth of Sisyphus, Albert Camus stated that whether life is worth living or not is a philosophical question.
Depression is the physical and psychological manifestation of a life without purpose and it is easy to imagine how people can become depressed when they lose their job, experience relationship problems, lose hope and don’t know what to live for.
The term “depression” is merely an over-simplification of philosophical and social problems interpreted as an illness affecting an individual’s psychological functions.
This term is hardly useful in understanding the illness because it covers up the illnesses of our social structure and ignores the need for people to search for meaning and value in life.
Medical reports show that anti-depressants are not enough in fighting depression and there have been many cases of people committing suicide even while they were on the drugs.
Therefore, instead of conducting depression checks on students, the ministry should focus on improving education about life and making our school campuses the bright, refreshing places of learning they once were.
Chiou Tian-juh is a professor of social psychology at Shih Hsin University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS