Attorney C.V. Chen (陳長文) made heated comments at a recent government ethics committee meeting about how National Property Administration head Kuo Wu-po (郭武博) received only a minor demerit from the Ministry of Finance for visiting a hostess lounge with businessmen. Chen called on Premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) to dish out stricter punishment, saying he was “astounded” at the lack of interest senior officials seemed to have in the matter.
That very same day, the Cabinet made Kuo an advisor. The speed of the decision was also astounding.
This is probably not the only thing about the government that should stun Chen.
Many senior officials who have been sued or caused a lot of controversy still hold high positions, such as Chen Song-chu (陳松柱), chairman of the Taiwan Asset Management Corp, and Ho Hung-jung (何鴻榮), who resigned from his post as chief of the Taipei City Bureau of Civil Affairs after being accused of neglecting his duties and having an affair with a secretary and is now chairman of Trade-Van Information Services. Another example was the recent by-elections for Taiwan Public Television Service board directors, where the review council — which should consist of “disinterested community members” — were instead a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, making them both player and referee.
Meanwhile, the vice president of the Central News Agency has not worked as a reporter or editor for three years. As someone who has worked in the media my whole life, I was astounded that something like this could happen.
There have also been recent reports that the Presidential Office spent NT$520,000 (US$16,000) commissioning Lee and Li Attorneys-at-Law, where C.V. Chen is a managing partner, to look into the “state affairs” fund case. Given the sensitivity of the matter, C.V. Chen’s involvement in the investigation raises questions and begs clarifications.
He has written articles criticizing the KMT for its handling of its party assets and expressing hope that the KMT would give up all its assets and leave the past behind to win more respect.
He has also asked that the KMT promise to return remaining assets to the national treasury or donate them to public interest groups after the presidential election.
The party, however, has done nothing in this regard — especially now, when everyone is facing tougher times.
Not long ago at a meeting with grassroots organizations, KMT Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) made an even more astounding statement when he said that the KMT would keep its party assets — worth approximately NT$20 billion — because they could help the party eliminate “black gold” practices in the nomination process.
It is quite astounding that C.V. Chen, with his lofty morals, has failed to follow up on this matter.
Recently, he published another article about the promise of government ethics. At the end of his article, Chen said he hoped the civil service system would set a standard to encourage capable individuals to perform to the best of their potential while warning the less qualified that their performance is being monitored.
This may be the best comment regarding skill and virtue in government.
The problem is that all this serious talk is falling on deaf ears. The examples above should be adequate to help C.V. Chen understand why the government has upset so many people.
Lu I-ming is the former publisher and president of Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under