This year Kenny Furst came close to breaking the habit of a lifetime. Brought up in a Jewish neighborhood in the Bronx, New York, under Roosevelt’s New Deal, he is and always has been a Democrat. But this year, for the first time, the 90-year-old was veering toward voting Republican or not at all.
The problem was Senator Barack Obama.
“He’s the first Democratic candidate I haven’t been sure about. As far as I was concerned he was connected with the Arabs,” Furst said, speaking in Tamarac, Florida, where he retired to 18 years ago.
For his wife Selma, 87, as for many Jewish Americans, the ties to the Democratic party were also umbilical. Yet she did not like the idea of an African-American president and was worried about rumors that Obama was a secret Muslim. Then something happened.
Their grandson announced he was flying from Los Angeles, 4,000km away, to visit. Mike Bender had learned of an Internet-driven initiative to get young Jewish voters to make a “great schlep” to Florida to persuade their wavering grandparents to vote for Obama.
The viral movement was backed by a video message by the comedian Sarah Silverman, saying: “You know why your grandparents don’t like Obama, because his name sounds scary. Yes Barack Hussein Obama is a super shitty name, but you’d think somebody named Manishevitz Guberman would understand that.”
Bender watched the video, laughed and decided to traverse the States to confront his grandparents.
He was not alone. Over the weekend dozens of young Jewish Americans traveled to Florida with the ambition of swinging this ultimate swing state in favor of Obama. Hundreds more have made the lesser schlep, or “mini schlep” — lobbying their grandparents by phone.
The thinking behind it starts with the assumption, widely held by political analysts, that if Senator John McCain, is to have any chance he must win Florida. Democrats have taken the state only three times in the past 12 presidential elections: Lyndon Johnson in 1964; Jimmy Carter in 1976; and Bill Clinton in 1996. But the contest has frequently been close, famously so in 2000 when George W. Bush squeezed into the White House with just 537 more votes in Florida than Al Gore.
That sense of opportunity explains why the Obama campaign has posted hundreds of staff in the state and is spending a record US$39 million there, far more than McCain. The investment has to some extent paid off, with polls showing a three-point lead, though that falls within the margin of error.
Which is where the Jewish vote comes in. About 10 million registered Jewish voters live in Florida, mainly older people in retirement condominiums along the so-called Gold Coast. Most are lifelong Democrats originating from New York and the northeast, but this year there is an estimated 13 percent who, like the Fursts, are undecided. That equates to up to 100,000 votes: enough to determine the outcome of Florida, and with it the fate of the nation.
“The No. 1 way to influence the outcome of the election as Jewish people is to influence your grandparents in Florida,” said Ari Wallach, an instigator of the great schlep.
Those who embarked on that schlep found the going was sometimes tough. University student Cobin Dopkeen, who flew from Boston, had no need to convert his grandparents who are already for Obama, so instead accosted other residents and visitors in their retirement complex in Miami. Which is when he met Lenny, a 62-year-old Floridian out for a walk with his 92-year-old father.
“You have to be out of your fucking mind to support Obama,” was Lenny’s reply. “No. 1: He supports Hamas. No. 2: He sat with Reverend Wright for 20 years as he spieled out his anti-Semitic hatred.”
And Lenny doesn’t want a black president.
“I grew up in the sixties when blacks were called nigger. OK, nowadays I say N-word, but I still think it,” he said.
Republicans in south Florida predict a 10 percent spike for McCain in the Jewish vote over the 24 percent polled by Bush in 2004. Their campaign line is that if Obama wins he will be the first pro-Palestinian US president since the foundation of the state of Israel. The Democrats hit back with leaflets showing Obama by Jerusalem’s Wailing Wall wearing a yarmulka.
From most schleppers’ experiences, the unbending hostility of Lenny was the exception. Many reported a warm reception from most Jewish Americans in Florida who are already in the Obama camp. Others notched up success stories, including Bender’s grandparents.
His visit moved and impressed. It led to long conversations in which he sought to allay their fears. Obama was a Christian, he said, a vocal supporter of Israel who has pledged to work for all Americans. The final hurdle was convincing his grandmother that Obama was not a Muslim.
“I said to her that if there are any people who can understand the wickedness of lies said about them, it is the Jews. That hit home,” he said.
Within a day of their grandson’s arrival, the Fursts had declared for Obama and had begun proselytizing with the zeal of the newly converted. Kenny Furst has been posting Obama flyers at the bagel shop where he still works, and his wife is holding discussion groups with other Jewish women from the retirement home.
“I’m so proud of my grandparents, that they were open-minded enough to listen,” Bender said.
“I’ve got a couple of years to go, so this vote isn’t for me,” his grandfather said. “All I’m interested in now is that my grandchildren should be safe. This one is for them.”
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS