The main purpose of the planned visit by Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) is to push China’s united front strategy, one of three key tactics used by Mao Zedong (毛澤東) during the Chinese revolution. Before Chen’s predecessor Wang Daohan (汪道涵) was scheduled to visit Taiwan in 1999, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) proposed his “special state-to-state” policy to forge a stronger national consciousness and prevent the nation’s sovereignty from being compromised.
Of course, Chen will not admit to pushing the united front strategy and he has proposed discussing cross-strait cargo flights to disguise the purpose of his visit. This proposal was based on a consensus between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
However, the issue of cargo flights, which had already been agreed on by the previous government, was ignored by high-level KMT officials during the last round of cross-strait talks. They did so to allow the CCP to use the issue as a “gift” to Taiwan when Chen visits.
What lies behind China’s alleged goodwill? This is the fundamental question that Taiwan must ask itself. Former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Chen Ming-tong (陳明通) said that based on Beijing’s strategy toward Taiwan, Chen Yunlin will bring up highly political issues with the intention of pushing Taiwan into China’s unification framework or even transforming the meeting into preliminary talks on unification.
The government must be cautious. Chen Ming-tong’s warning is not a false alarm: The delivery of two pandas, which were originally scheduled to arrive together with Chen Yunlin, has now been canceled. China did not want to cause an unnecessary dispute over the pandas.
The government can use the tainted milk powder scandal to counteract Chen Yunlin’s united-front tactics. Since the toxic milk powder affected individuals and enterprises across the political spectrum in Taiwan, the government can use the incident to mobilize public opinion against Chen Yunlin and the CCP. Moreover, food safety is closely related to national security. Without sovereignty, food safety and the health and well-being of Taiwanese will be jeopardized. Regardless of whether we advocate Taiwanese independence or recognize the Republic of China, there is one constant — anti-unification.
The Taiwanese public now has a rare opportunity to unite and fight the CCP. The protests against President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) on Ketagalan Boulevard were distorted by some people into a malicious political battle between pan-blue and pan-green supporters, and the police even got involved. However, if a similar march had been organized to protest against the CCP in the name of national sovereignty, would Ma dare dispatch policemen to arrest participants? If he did, he would reveal his true colors. But if he didn’t, he would certainly displease his CCP “bosses.” This would ultimately put Ma in a position where he would have to choose between Taiwan and the CCP.
Ma’s moves to sell out Taiwan are out of control. He has even rejected the legislature’s right to supervise the process. Both pan-blue and pan-green supporters should take advantage of Chen Yunlin’s visit to safeguard Taiwan’s sovereignty in an unprecedented show of unity.
We cannot expect the pan-blue camp to organize this campaign, so the responsibility must lie with the pan-green camp. Pan-green parties and groups should work together and integrate their limited financial and human resources to set up campaign goals. They cannot just organize campaigns against Ma.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS