Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) is scheduled to visit Taiwan at the end of this month. If Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) and Chen reach a consensus on such issues as direct sea links, chartered cargo flights and more direct passenger flight routes, they will sign an agreement during their meeting.
Since the agenda has been settled, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) has demanded that the Cabinet send the “draft guidelines for the signing of agreements between the Taiwan area and the mainland area” (台灣地區與大陸地區訂定協議處理條理條例草案) to the legislature for review as soon as possible. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus took the lead on Friday in proposing a bill to expedite the establishment of legislative supervision. These actions are legitimate and supported by the public, so President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration cannot disregard them without inciting unrest.
The Ma administration has pushed various measures to open up cross-strait links at the fastest pace in 60 years. In June, the SEF and the ARATS conducted the first round of formal cross-strait negotiations since 1999, which reached a consensus on issues such as cross-strait passenger flights and opening up Taiwan to Chinese tourists. Yet the under-the-table decision-making process, unorganized negotiation strategies and the lack of benefits to Taiwan from these talks led to widespread public criticism and a loss of confidence in Ma’s government.
The next round of cross-strait talks will discuss issues that involve national sovereignty, national security and the public’s rights and interests. Such issues are not something that can be unilaterally determined by the Cabinet or any single political party. The government must increase public participation in the matter.
In particular, any issues that touch on the Act Governing Relations Between Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (兩岸人民關係條例) must be reviewed by the legislature and then enacted into law. If there are no laws to regulate the review of cross-strait agreements, how can Chiang negotiate with Chen?
Article 5 of the act stipulates that “where the content of the agreement requires any amendment to laws or any new legislation, the administration authorities of the agreement shall submit the agreement through the Executive Yuan to the Legislative Yuan for consideration.” Article 95 states that “the competent authorities shall request the consent of the Legislative Yuan before permitting direct business transactions or direct sea or air transportation between the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area, or permitting the people of the Mainland Area to enter into the Taiwan Area to work, and if the Legislative Yuan fails to adopt any resolution within one month after the request during its session, the consent is deemed granted.” These stipulations stress that legislative supervision should be established. There is no room for ambiguity.
But enacting a special law to regulate the legislative supervision of cross-strait agreements has been the subject of debate for a long time. In 1997, the KMT proposed that “the draft guidelines for the signing of agreements between the Taiwan area and the mainland area” should be submitted to the legislature for consideration. The Cabinet then sent the draft to the legislature for review before then-ARATS chairman Wang Daohan’s (汪道涵) visit to Taiwan.
It is thus clear that in order to prepare for the resumption of cross-strait talks, the former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government was aware of the complexity of cross-strait issues and the need to gain public support on the matter before and after the negotiations. It was also perceived that administrative powers were not enough to represent the entire nation and that without the necessary participation of the legislature, any agreements reached were incapable of representing the opinion of the 23 million people of Taiwan.
However, in its return to power, the KMT has not improved with time, and has instead regressed. With Chen scheduled to visit Taiwan soon, Wang called on the Cabinet to send the draft guidelines to the legislature for review, but Premier Liu Chao- shiuan (劉兆玄) has yet to respond. It seems that Liu is going to emulate the last meeting between Chiang and Chen and decide on the matter by himself.
Last week, the Cabinet said that if both sides signed a new agreement, the deal would be sent to the legislature for approval. This is tantamount to saying no to the idea of supervision of the decision-making process.
The pan-blue camp controls three-quarters of the seats in the legislature. Wang is also a KMT legislator. Although the DPP proposed to have the draft guidelines sent to the legislature, it does not have the seats to reject any agreement. It is bewildering that the Ma administration insists on closed-door cross-strait negotiations and appears to fear increased participation in the matter. What on earth is the government worried about?
Only those who regard negotiations with other countries as a private matter, which they can use in achieving their own personal goals, would try to keep the content, process and results of negotiations secret. Transparency is the key to negotiations. Therefore we really have to ask ourselves just what Ma is trying to achieve in negotiations with China.
The legislature has been discussing the establishment of a special task force for dealing with cross-strait affairs, which will be established soon. The legislature, political parties, civic groups, non-government organizations and opinion leaders should use all their power to take part in discussions about negotiations with China before Chen arrives to ensure that no oversights or errors that could harm our sovereignty, national security and social welfare occur.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG AND DREW CAMERON
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with