One doesn’t have to look very hard to turn up some stomach-churning facts about the nation’s food safety standards.
Reports emerged last week that vegetables imported from Japan were actually from China. The Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) reported that Chinese product information had been covered with Japanese labels on packages of the pricey frozen vegetables, leading customers to believe they were paying high prices for high quality.
But authorities were unfazed. The Bureau of Food Sanitation said consumers shouldn’t lose sleep over mislabeled products because imports pass inspection and meet standards to enter the country.
That reassurance sounded like a bad joke when King Car Industrial Co pulled eight of its products from shelves nationwide over the weekend. Tests revealed the products — seven kinds of instant coffee and one kind of instant soup — all contained melamine. The products did not contain powdered dairy ingredients and therefore had not been targeted by the Department of Health (DOH).
King Car’s decision to have its products tested was apparently voluntary, so credit goes to the company for opening the eyes of the authorities to potential contamination in non-dairy products. The revelation that milk-free ingredients from China also contained melamine led the department to widen its testing of products from China to include those with powdered protein.
However, King Car first imported tainted non-dairy creamer from China last December, and part of the batch has already disappeared from store shelves. While there is no cause for panic — not a single instance of illness in Taiwan has been linked to melamine — there is certainly cause for concern that the situation was allowed to occur at all.
The purpose of food safety standards is to keep toxic items off our dinner plates. For that reason, assurances that customers probably didn’t consume enough melamine to immediately become sick is beside the point. Any melamine content in food is inexcusable.
Likewise, with the department standing by its decision not to recall all tainted products that have already hit stores — presumably because of the losses this would entail for struggling food companies — the public can be forgiven if it has lost confidence in food safety controls.
Chinese products have been hit by scandal after scandal in the past year, with possibly the most shocking news being that officials swept reports of the tainted milk under the carpet one week before the Beijing Olympic Games.
With a staggering 53,000 children confirmed sick from toxic milk powder and more than 12,000 still hospitalized, it is the Chinese public that is paying the distressing price of dirty deals between authorities and companies. That is a breach of trust that all of Chinese President Hu Jintao’s (胡錦濤) promises and Premier Wen Jiabao’s (溫家寶) visits to hospitals will be hard pressed to heal.
We can expect to see more heads to roll in China, but punishing a few is no substitute for overhauling a corrupt and cynical system.
In Taiwan, meanwhile, Democratic Progressive Party lawmakers have called for resignations to shoulder responsibility. But replacing officials alone will not guarantee results, especially as some melamine-tainted products may have been left on store shelves. Without overhauling systems for inspecting imported goods, the government’s message to consumers is: “Watch what you eat, because we’ve done all we have to.”
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily