One doesn’t have to look very hard to turn up some stomach-churning facts about the nation’s food safety standards.
Reports emerged last week that vegetables imported from Japan were actually from China. The Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) reported that Chinese product information had been covered with Japanese labels on packages of the pricey frozen vegetables, leading customers to believe they were paying high prices for high quality.
But authorities were unfazed. The Bureau of Food Sanitation said consumers shouldn’t lose sleep over mislabeled products because imports pass inspection and meet standards to enter the country.
That reassurance sounded like a bad joke when King Car Industrial Co pulled eight of its products from shelves nationwide over the weekend. Tests revealed the products — seven kinds of instant coffee and one kind of instant soup — all contained melamine. The products did not contain powdered dairy ingredients and therefore had not been targeted by the Department of Health (DOH).
King Car’s decision to have its products tested was apparently voluntary, so credit goes to the company for opening the eyes of the authorities to potential contamination in non-dairy products. The revelation that milk-free ingredients from China also contained melamine led the department to widen its testing of products from China to include those with powdered protein.
However, King Car first imported tainted non-dairy creamer from China last December, and part of the batch has already disappeared from store shelves. While there is no cause for panic — not a single instance of illness in Taiwan has been linked to melamine — there is certainly cause for concern that the situation was allowed to occur at all.
The purpose of food safety standards is to keep toxic items off our dinner plates. For that reason, assurances that customers probably didn’t consume enough melamine to immediately become sick is beside the point. Any melamine content in food is inexcusable.
Likewise, with the department standing by its decision not to recall all tainted products that have already hit stores — presumably because of the losses this would entail for struggling food companies — the public can be forgiven if it has lost confidence in food safety controls.
Chinese products have been hit by scandal after scandal in the past year, with possibly the most shocking news being that officials swept reports of the tainted milk under the carpet one week before the Beijing Olympic Games.
With a staggering 53,000 children confirmed sick from toxic milk powder and more than 12,000 still hospitalized, it is the Chinese public that is paying the distressing price of dirty deals between authorities and companies. That is a breach of trust that all of Chinese President Hu Jintao’s (胡錦濤) promises and Premier Wen Jiabao’s (溫家寶) visits to hospitals will be hard pressed to heal.
We can expect to see more heads to roll in China, but punishing a few is no substitute for overhauling a corrupt and cynical system.
In Taiwan, meanwhile, Democratic Progressive Party lawmakers have called for resignations to shoulder responsibility. But replacing officials alone will not guarantee results, especially as some melamine-tainted products may have been left on store shelves. Without overhauling systems for inspecting imported goods, the government’s message to consumers is: “Watch what you eat, because we’ve done all we have to.”
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS