A record 97.1 percent of candidates were accepted to colleges after this year’s national college entrance examination. But a more disturbing record was also set — the lowest exam score among those accepted was 7.69 points, a big drop from the previous record low of 18.47 points set last year.
The combination of falling birthrates and the proliferation of universities has meant more schools have found themselves short of students in recent years. To fill places, they have been lowering their entrance requirements every year.
This year, however, was the first in which the lowest acceptance score added up to less than one point for each subject tested, suggesting the examinee basically gave up on the test.
Yet the student shortfall for many colleges has reached a new high. Some could not even fill one-tenth of the available places. The total shortfall is 10 times greater than last year’s. This could be the prelude to a wave of closures among private colleges.
How has it come to this? If college entrance exam results are a reliable measure of someone’s ability to go to university, what are we to make of a 7.96 score?
Could it really be that senior and vocational high schools are completely failing to prepare their students for college?
Does the problem lie with high school courses and teaching, or is it that high schoolers aren’t interested in their courses and are just drifting through school?
What a waste of time for the students and for society.
And what about the parents? Are they failing to properly appreciate their children’s inclinations and interests?
Maybe they should consider letting their children go to technical or vocational schools, or go straight to work, where they can master work skills, instead of having them go to cram schools again and again and sit exams just to try to get a college degree.
The shortage of applicants over the past three years has devalued the nation’s universities.
It used to be assumed that going to university would enhance a person’s social mobility, improve his or her quality of life and boost employment prospects.
The education reforms of the past decade, however, have led to a proliferation of senior high schools and universities. In the process, big differences have appeared between the top universities and the lesser ones both in terms of instruction and prospects for employment after graduation.
The universities are coming to replicate and perpetuate the polarization between rich and poor.
My own research indicates that the total costs of school fees and living expenses over four years of study come to about NT$1 million (US$31,800) for students at state-run universities and more than NT$1.3 million for those at private colleges.
However, college graduates face high unemployment rates.
Starting three or four years ago, the unemployment rate for college graduates has been higher than the overall jobless rate and well above that for people with other levels of education.
Apart from calling for better quality education, perhaps parents and students should weigh up the relative opportunities and costs of going to college. All the more so considering that many people apply for student loans to attend private universities, saddling themselves with a heavy debt upon graduation.
Such a financial burden can derail a person’s plans for work, marriage, buying a home and having children.
So shouldn’t we be looking at alternatives to university?
Otherwise, with a diploma in hand but no vocational or survival skills, many college graduates will find it hard to gain a foothold in society.
As for those schools that are having trouble recruiting students, the government should not jusanzencourage them to close.
They should consider other options, including restructuring or mergers and the legal framework governing higher education should be relaxed.
Above all, avenues for working adults to engage in continuing education are limited, and the vocational qualification system has not been properly implemented.
Since many adults have no way to pursue continuing education, people have no option but to enter higher education and get their qualifications when they are young, rather than gaining work skills first and going to college later.
Japan began feeling the impact of falling birth rates a decade or more ago, and the Japanese have been implementing university restructuring and mergers for several years.
Nearly four in 10 Japanese universities find it difficult to fill places.
These universities have responded by offering different kinds of courses, reorganizing departments and targeting different groups for student recruitment, with many classes aimed at adults and retired people.
What policies does Taiwan have to deal with the surfeit of universities, shortage of college applicants and falling entry requirements?
Prudence Chou is a professor of education at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just