With China’s rapid rise in recent years capturing the world’s attention, the Beijing Olympics have sharpened the focus of the international community on China.
The scale of these Olympics is far greater than previous Games and will probably be the most spectacular of them all. But whether China will be able to create an image distinct from EU and US hegemony as it crosses the threshold from developing to developed country lies at the heart of global concerns.
A look at US and UK hegemony in the 20th century shows that hegemonic countries employ a carrot-and-stick approach consisting of military threats and systemic controls while providing public wealth incentives such as security, stability and economic and trade prospects.
The pessimistic view is that if China were to achieve its desired level of hegemony, it would just be another version of the standard hegemon, or maybe even more imperious than the UK and the US.
Regrettably, China has in recent years seemed to be wearing the false mask of an outdated hegemon. The Chinese Communist Party thirsts for power in the same way as the UK and the US, but in a manner more arrogant and overbearing. During the Cold War, the US turned a blind eye to the autocracy of allies in the name of anti-communism. The Chinese government today plays the same game by unconditionally supporting the actions of pro-China countries such as Myanmar and Sudan despite the risk of universal condemnation — so long as these countries supply the raw materials China needs for economic development.
Although China speaks unreservedly of world peace and justice, it is behaving in the same way as Western hegemons.
China is not an easily satisfied country. In the recent failed WTO Doha round, China was for the first time invited to attend closed-door negotiations with the US, the EU, Brazil, India, Japan and Australia. This represented a great leap in China’s position on the international stage — officially becoming a core country that decides on global political and economic development.
China has even worked with India to block US and EU interests. Although this reflects the declining power of the US and the EU, it also shows that China’s desire for power is hard to satisfy.
Chinese imperialism may look benevolent on the surface but it is hardly inspirational. The core value remains the balance of power amid cycles of economic stability claimed by Western hegemons; there is nothing new, therefore, in China’s version of hegemony. But the cost of succumbing to Chinese domination could involve shrinking political participation and declining human rights protection.
Chinese imperialism might lead to affluence, but it will not bring dignity and justice to the world. Nor will the rise of China bring a new vision to the world; another wearying hegemon is all it will be.
China cannot deflect the complex feelings of surprise and fear toward it that are emerging around the world. Its rise is merely another addition to the long line of rising and falling hegemons.
The world is fed up with the aging American hegemony, and the dazzling performances during the Olympics’ opening ceremony that stole the international spotlight might point to a changing world.
However, after the Olympics are over, in the shadow of a global power struggle, it is hard to see how China can bring hope to global development.
Chen Hsin-chih is an associate professor of political science at National Cheng Kung University.
Translated by Ted Yang
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS