In order to fulfill the promises President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) made during the presidential election campaign, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-dominated legislature hastily passed the National Pension Act (國民年金法) on the final day of the legislative session. Although this was a law that many had long wanted to see passed, it has also received a great deal of criticism.
Those opposing the law directed their concerns at the problems haunting farmers’ insurance and other financial difficulties the government is facing. While their dissatisfaction is understandable, real focus should be on the unfairness of the National Pension Act. Compared with the monthly pension payments to military officials, public servants and teachers, the payments under the National Pension Act and the Labor Insurance Annuity (勞保年金) scheme — which was passed the day before the National Pension Act — are a pittance.
At present, military personnel, public servants and teachers receive pensions once they reach the age of 50 and have served for 25 years. Retired elementary school teachers receive at least NT$50,000 per month, while principals receive up to NT$100,000. The situation is even more ridiculous with retired military personnel: A person who studied at the Chung Cheng Armed Forces Preparatory School or the ROC Military Academy after graduating from junior high school can receive between NT$60,000 and NT$70,000 when they turn 40. Military personnel and elementary school teachers pay no taxes. By the time they reach the age of 80 or 90, they will have received tens of millions of dollars. When they pass away, their spouses continue to receive half of the original monthly pension payments.
No other country has a pension system so generous with taxpayers’ money. In Germany, individuals have to work for 40 years and hand out 20 percent of their salary to fund their retirement. Only after they turn 65 will they be able to receive 70 percent to 80 percent of their salary as pension payments. Because of a declining birth rate and a rapid increase in the elderly population, two years ago the German government raised the retirement age to 67 to cope with massive pension costs.
Taiwan has a ludicrous system aimed at benefiting military personnel, public servants and teachers, who only make up a small minority of the population. The majority of Taiwanese have long had to use their own savings to finance their retirement. The National Pension Act means that non-civil service workers who have paid insurance fees for 40 years will be receiving less than NT$9,000 per month after they retire.
Monthly pensions for military personnel, public servants and teachers not only have an adverse impact on social justice, but are also likely to destroy the nation’s economy.
Not long ago, former civil service minister Chu Wu-hsien (朱武獻) admitted that the pension fund was NT$1.2 trillion (US$39.45 billion) in the red. Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics data showed that NT$210 billion was spent on retirement pensions for military personnel, public servants and teachers in 2004 — equivalent to the total amount of individual income tax collected that year. The problem with this system is that the amount spent on pensions will increase as life expectancy increases, which could topple Taiwan’s economy.
Ma should make revamping these pension plans one of his top priorities. This is also the best way for him to win votes from both the pan-blue and the pan-green camps.
Huang Jui-ming is an associate professor of law at Providence University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of