In order to fulfill the promises President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) made during the presidential election campaign, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-dominated legislature hastily passed the National Pension Act (國民年金法) on the final day of the legislative session. Although this was a law that many had long wanted to see passed, it has also received a great deal of criticism.
Those opposing the law directed their concerns at the problems haunting farmers’ insurance and other financial difficulties the government is facing. While their dissatisfaction is understandable, real focus should be on the unfairness of the National Pension Act. Compared with the monthly pension payments to military officials, public servants and teachers, the payments under the National Pension Act and the Labor Insurance Annuity (勞保年金) scheme — which was passed the day before the National Pension Act — are a pittance.
At present, military personnel, public servants and teachers receive pensions once they reach the age of 50 and have served for 25 years. Retired elementary school teachers receive at least NT$50,000 per month, while principals receive up to NT$100,000. The situation is even more ridiculous with retired military personnel: A person who studied at the Chung Cheng Armed Forces Preparatory School or the ROC Military Academy after graduating from junior high school can receive between NT$60,000 and NT$70,000 when they turn 40. Military personnel and elementary school teachers pay no taxes. By the time they reach the age of 80 or 90, they will have received tens of millions of dollars. When they pass away, their spouses continue to receive half of the original monthly pension payments.
No other country has a pension system so generous with taxpayers’ money. In Germany, individuals have to work for 40 years and hand out 20 percent of their salary to fund their retirement. Only after they turn 65 will they be able to receive 70 percent to 80 percent of their salary as pension payments. Because of a declining birth rate and a rapid increase in the elderly population, two years ago the German government raised the retirement age to 67 to cope with massive pension costs.
Taiwan has a ludicrous system aimed at benefiting military personnel, public servants and teachers, who only make up a small minority of the population. The majority of Taiwanese have long had to use their own savings to finance their retirement. The National Pension Act means that non-civil service workers who have paid insurance fees for 40 years will be receiving less than NT$9,000 per month after they retire.
Monthly pensions for military personnel, public servants and teachers not only have an adverse impact on social justice, but are also likely to destroy the nation’s economy.
Not long ago, former civil service minister Chu Wu-hsien (朱武獻) admitted that the pension fund was NT$1.2 trillion (US$39.45 billion) in the red. Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics data showed that NT$210 billion was spent on retirement pensions for military personnel, public servants and teachers in 2004 — equivalent to the total amount of individual income tax collected that year. The problem with this system is that the amount spent on pensions will increase as life expectancy increases, which could topple Taiwan’s economy.
Ma should make revamping these pension plans one of his top priorities. This is also the best way for him to win votes from both the pan-blue and the pan-green camps.
Huang Jui-ming is an associate professor of law at Providence University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry