In order to fulfill the promises President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) made during the presidential election campaign, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-dominated legislature hastily passed the National Pension Act (國民年金法) on the final day of the legislative session. Although this was a law that many had long wanted to see passed, it has also received a great deal of criticism.
Those opposing the law directed their concerns at the problems haunting farmers’ insurance and other financial difficulties the government is facing. While their dissatisfaction is understandable, real focus should be on the unfairness of the National Pension Act. Compared with the monthly pension payments to military officials, public servants and teachers, the payments under the National Pension Act and the Labor Insurance Annuity (勞保年金) scheme — which was passed the day before the National Pension Act — are a pittance.
At present, military personnel, public servants and teachers receive pensions once they reach the age of 50 and have served for 25 years. Retired elementary school teachers receive at least NT$50,000 per month, while principals receive up to NT$100,000. The situation is even more ridiculous with retired military personnel: A person who studied at the Chung Cheng Armed Forces Preparatory School or the ROC Military Academy after graduating from junior high school can receive between NT$60,000 and NT$70,000 when they turn 40. Military personnel and elementary school teachers pay no taxes. By the time they reach the age of 80 or 90, they will have received tens of millions of dollars. When they pass away, their spouses continue to receive half of the original monthly pension payments.
No other country has a pension system so generous with taxpayers’ money. In Germany, individuals have to work for 40 years and hand out 20 percent of their salary to fund their retirement. Only after they turn 65 will they be able to receive 70 percent to 80 percent of their salary as pension payments. Because of a declining birth rate and a rapid increase in the elderly population, two years ago the German government raised the retirement age to 67 to cope with massive pension costs.
Taiwan has a ludicrous system aimed at benefiting military personnel, public servants and teachers, who only make up a small minority of the population. The majority of Taiwanese have long had to use their own savings to finance their retirement. The National Pension Act means that non-civil service workers who have paid insurance fees for 40 years will be receiving less than NT$9,000 per month after they retire.
Monthly pensions for military personnel, public servants and teachers not only have an adverse impact on social justice, but are also likely to destroy the nation’s economy.
Not long ago, former civil service minister Chu Wu-hsien (朱武獻) admitted that the pension fund was NT$1.2 trillion (US$39.45 billion) in the red. Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics data showed that NT$210 billion was spent on retirement pensions for military personnel, public servants and teachers in 2004 — equivalent to the total amount of individual income tax collected that year. The problem with this system is that the amount spent on pensions will increase as life expectancy increases, which could topple Taiwan’s economy.
Ma should make revamping these pension plans one of his top priorities. This is also the best way for him to win votes from both the pan-blue and the pan-green camps.
Huang Jui-ming is an associate professor of law at Providence University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
An article published in the Dec. 12, 1949, edition of the Central Daily News (中央日報) bore a headline with the intimidating phrase: “You Cannot Escape.” The article was about the execution of seven “communist spies,” some say on the basis of forced confessions, at the end of the 713 Penghu Incident. Those were different times, born of political paranoia shortly after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) relocated to Taiwan following defeat in China by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The phrase was a warning by the KMT regime to the local populace not to challenge its power or threaten national unity. The
The Iran war has exposed a fundamental vulnerability in the global energy system. The escalating confrontation between Iran, Israel and the US has begun to shake international energy markets, largely because Iran is disrupting shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow waterway carries roughly one-third of the world’s seaborne oil, making it one of the most strategically sensitive energy corridors in the world. Even the possibility of disruption has triggered sharp volatility in global oil prices. The duration and scope of the conflict remain uncertain, with senior US officials offering contradictory signals about how long military operations might continue.